this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8481 readers
254 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aev_software@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

And who didn't know this?

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 hours ago

Ban cow farming

[–] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

Slash and burn ag is so stupid...

From Wikipedia:

The productivity of the soil following forest removal for farming lasts only a year or two before the fields become infertile and farmers must clear new areas of forest to maintain their income. In 1995, nearly half (48%) of the deforestation in Brazil was attributed to poorer farmers clearing lots under 125 acres (0.51 km2) in size.

They typically grow crops on the land at first, then due to poor soil management it becomes useless for crops so they put cattle on it and burn down more forest to grow more soy or whatever.

Then again. Big picture time.... We're globally releasing enough GHGs that it's equivalent to burning down the entire Amazon rainforest every two months.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Those who trade forest for steak will eventually have neither forests nor steaks.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, it won't be them in most cases. It will be future generations and people in poorer countries that suffer first and the hardest.

[–] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Let the future generations eat cake! Heh. Happy cake day!

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Have you seen the price of beef? The future is now! ;)

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I haven't, but I'm more than happy if the market proofs me wrong. IMO the price can't be high enough if that's what it takes to reduce the demand.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The demand is insatiable, and unmet. Price based demand destruction is only part what were seeing here. Whatever can be made will be sold. We can't supply enough to meet demand so we ration by price.

It's not the victory you probably hope for.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Glad I stopped eating beef years ago. I'm not the problem.

[–] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Cows aren't a problem.

People are.

Are you not a person?