this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
85 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42265 readers
292 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Enshitification so soon? And the bubble hasn't burst yet? I know it's all a matter of time before I ask AI for FOSS software recommendations and it tries to upsell me on some cloud-subscription bullshit that "addresses all my requirements" and comes with "award winning 24/7 support".

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago

someone with a corner office in redmond reminded someone else that shareholders expect to see an immediate return on their $100+ billion 'investment' in this shit.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No fucking way! ROFLMAO if true

[–] SomeRandomNoob@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] ferric_carcinization@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

It looks like the pull requests were authored by humans, then edited by the bot. I use codeberg, not github, so I'm not that familiar with the service. Does github have some kind of opt-in/opt-out llm editor feature, or is the bot just going around editing random pull requests?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I believe that it happened, but I'm not yet convinced it wasn't some sort of bug. But I want to believe!

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

so it seems raycast embeds this promo with link

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, so it's still just github copilot code review (bot). https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/code-review#introduction

Which is embedding this link of Raycast. Meaning Raycast is paying Microsoft for sure to get included in the bot comments or pr descriptions.

[–] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

It is so uncool even sad

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

Capitalism breeds innovation.

The innovation:

Good, I hope every PR submitted by an AI proudly displays the AI that it was made with so maintainers know which PRs to reject

This is just the average Atlassian or Slack experience coming to GitHub. You're just trying to do your job and the platform is constantly trying to push you to use services of advertisers.

[–] sakuraba@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They already came out to say "we're sowwy" and took it back after the backlash

We've disabled it already. Basically it was giving product tips which was kinda ok on Copilot originated PR's but then when we added the ability to have Copilot work on any PR by mentioning it the behaviour became icky. Disabled product tips entirely thanks to the feedback.

https://xcancel.com/martinwoodward/status/2038612131084464521>>

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

why is copilot submitting prs? i figured any reasonable dev would use ai, if at all, like a rubber duck and syntax library?

i still use devdocs.io - that’s my goto.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lots of unreasonable devs out there.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah, and the worst part is that submitting the PR is trivial. You just offload the reviewing work onto the maintainer and then feed the review comments back into the AI. Effectively, you're making the maintainer talk to the AI, by going through you as a middleman, a.k.a. completely wasting their time.

[–] aReallyCrunchyLeaf@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Microsoft has become spiritually similar to one of those late night infomercial companies. So shameless and deeply unserious.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah. They became that a few decades ago.