this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
774 points (98.9% liked)

News

36915 readers
2787 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a US representative, said on Wednesday that she will oppose any future US military aid to Israel, including for defensive systems.

In a statement on social media, Ocasio-Cortez said that Israel was fully capable of funding “Iron Dome and other defensive systems”, and that “consistent with my voting record to date, I will not support Congress sending more taxpayer dollars and military aid to a government that consistently ignores international law and US law”.

Her remarks on Wednesday follow reports that she pledged to oppose any future military aid to Israel during a New York City Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) forum on Tuesday evening.

“Our allies who need our military aid must understand that we will provide it consistent with the Leahy amendment and the foreign assistance act”, Ocasio-Cortez added, referring to a law which prohibits the US from providing military support to army units that violate human rights.

According to City & State, which obtained a partial recording of the DSA forum, Ocasio-Cortez told members: “I have not once ever voted to authorize funding to Israel, and I will never,” adding that “the Israeli government should be able to finance their own weapons if they seek to arm themselves.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 hours ago

Fuck yeah, hopefully AOC starts a fuck aid to Israel trend

[–] canniest_tod@lemmy.world 46 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Better late than never, but the left coalition of the party could have done this 75,000 Palestinians ago.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

accurate estimate range about 300000 Palestinians. or about 1/6th

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

“I have not once ever voted to authorize funding to Israel, and I will never,”

She has though: https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024128, https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2023681, https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202428

It's a much better track record than pretty much anyone else but this article and post is a pretty blatant attempt at reputation laundering.

Do y'all really fall for this so easily?

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Which one of these you linked is providing funding to Israel?

In order:

H.R.5917

This bill extends the authority of the President to impose sanctions on foreign persons using human shields through 2030 and requires the President to impose such sanctions on each foreign person determined to be a member of Palestine Islamic Jihad and orders, controls, or otherwise directs the use of human shields. Currently, such sanctions are (1) required for users of human shields who are members of Hamas or Hezbollah or supporters of those groups, and (2) authorized for other users of human shields.

The President must also determine if a person named in certain congressional requests meets the criteria for such sanctions and report on whether the President intends to impose sanctions on that person.

Additionally, the Department of Defense must report to Congress on the implications of the use of human shields by Hamas, Hezbollah, and Palestine Islamic Jihad.

H.R.5961

This bill requires the President to impose property-blocking sanctions on foreign financial institutions and international financial institutions that process, participate in, or facilitate a transaction involving certain Iranian funds (namely, the approximately $6 billion of Iranian funds that the Biden administration permitted to be transferred from restricted accounts in South Korea to restricted accounts in Qatar to facilitate the release of five U.S. citizens detained in Iran).

H.R.6679

This bill imposes immigration-related penalties on certain non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) who are involved with terrorism or attacks against Israel.

Under this bill, members of Palestinian Islamic Jihad or Hamas or who participated in or otherwise facilitated the October 7, 2023, attacks on Israel may not be admitted into the United States.

The bill also expands an existing admissions bar against officers, representatives, and spokespersons of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). Under this bill, all PLO members are barred from admission into the United States.

The bill also prohibits any non-U.S. national who participated in or otherwise facilitated the October 7, 2023, attacks from seeking any immigration-related relief or protections, including (1) protection from being deported to a country where the individual's life or freedom would be threatened, or (2) asylum in the United States.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Summaries are generally misleading.

Full text for H.R.5917: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/5917/text where it outlines the modifications to public law 115-348 which according to Sec. 3.d authorizes usage of the IEEPA to enforce sanctions.

Israel then directly receives defense spending to enforce those sanctions as well as indirectly being funded via any seized assets that are found in violation of those sanctions as "reperations". Here's an example of a $500Mil funding source.

H.R.5961 uses essentially the same mechanism but targets Iran specifically redirecting a large chunk of the $6B mentioned towards Israel.

You are correct that H.R.6679 isn't about funding, but I still felt it was important to include.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 hours ago
[–] sneakypersimmon@lemmy.today 16 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

H.R.4016, the Department of Defense Appropriations Act

Sec. 8067. Of the amounts appropriated in this Act under the headings “Procurement, Defense-Wide” and “Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide”, $500,000,000 shall be for the Israeli Cooperative Programs: Provided, That of this amount, $60,000,000 shall be for the Secretary of Defense to provide to the Government of Israel for the procurement of the Iron Dome defense system to counter short-range rocket threats, subject to the U.S.-Israel Iron Dome Procurement Agreement; $127,000,000 shall be for the Short Range Ballistic Missile Defense (SRBMD) program, including cruise missile defense research and development under the SRBMD program; $40,000,000 shall be for co-production activities of SRBMD systems in the United States and in Israel to meet Israel’s defense requirements consistent with each nation’s laws, regulations, and procedures, subject to the U.S.-Israeli co-production agreement for SRBMD; $100,000,000 shall be for an upper-tier component to the Israeli Missile Defense Architecture, of which $100,000,000 shall be for co-production activities of Arrow 3 Upper Tier systems in the United States and in Israel to meet Israel’s defense requirements consistent with each nation’s laws, regulations, and procedures, subject to the U.S.-Israeli co-production agreement for Arrow 3 Upper Tier; and $173,000,000 shall be for the Arrow System Improvement Program including development of a long range, ground and airborne, detection suite.

This is what AOC voted on in regard to Israel and the Iron Dome.

MTG had offered an amendment that would cut the funding for Israeli defense and AOC voted against it, allowing the funds to remain in the bill.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 12 hours ago
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 136 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Go further than that, claw back our tax money to pay for healthcare dammit

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 49 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

Give em a bill and charge interest every year.

If they don't pay, most of the global economy still runs thru NYC, if we sanction their leaders and oligarchs instead of random ass "settlers" who don't even have a bank account, we could apply real pressure for their government to pay.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 13 hours ago

Yep, let's start playing Hard Ball. Stop giving breaks to economic predators and parasites.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 48 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sombody guard her because Mosad already is planing to eliminate her.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Support and protect this person and leaders like them. Fight for them.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I want to VOTE for her! Oh wait, I already do! Now want to vote for her for Senate (don't let the door clobber you in the ass on the way out Schmuckie-boy!), and then President!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

She was going to vote against it originally. Then supposedly Pelosi convinced her to change her vote. So she voted present.

It's a difficult spot to be in, given that much of her support relies on the zionists in New York like Schumer, etc in her party... Donors too...

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Im in her district. She doenst need that support. She is perfectly safe here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Steve@startrek.website 36 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Israel should be disarmed.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 19 points 13 hours ago

Hey, it looks like you’re trying to write Destroyed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Her continued political career depended on clearing that up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›