this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
8 points (90.0% liked)

politics

29789 readers
2304 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All those "illegal alien", "drug smugglers" now gonna be legal non-white citizens ... Hahaha!

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why didn't I think about this? This isn't about resources, or annexation. This is about him being the president who added another state. Something Obama didn't do.

Moron, he could easily make Puerto Rico the 51st state.

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

PR isn't sitting on vast oil reserves, waiting to be plundered.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

According to the Constitution, Trump cannot legally declare Venezuela the 51st state without congressional approval or Venezuela’s consent.

There’s that pesky concept again that Trump doesn’t seem to understand, or have, or know about.

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

"Trump cannot" (and "GOP cannot") is the down-beat in the song of life. It doesn't seem to matter what the law says for right-wingers when they're in power. They will do what they please in the absence of adequate resistance.

Edit: in this case, though, I doubt it's more than another distraction from the Epstein files

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Cannot only matters if someone stops them which hasn't been the case thus far

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

there's that pesky concept that this clown ignores laws and norms, and has 2 additional branches of goverment who are dedicated to nothing more than sycophancy to him.

The US government is currently run by calvinball rules.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 4 days ago

10 IQ idea. MAGA will love it.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

The US will never live down this level of stupidity and callousness.

[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Wait, but I thought Canada was going to be 51st state? Or was that Greenland? Or maybe Cuba?? /j

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

You may sit on the Jedi council but we do not grant you the rank of master, now say hello to the latest master Jarjar

The dream of Curtis Yarvin is alive in Venezuela

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Senile President said a thing

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm surprised. Hispanics generally vote Democratic. If Venezuela becomes a state, it will have 2 Senators and many House of Representatives members.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

THey'd get the same representation as Puerto Rico.

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The population of Venezuela is around 28.6 million. The population of Puerto Rico is around 3.2 million. Venezuela would get more House members.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's because Puerto Rico is not a state. According to the title of this post, Trump is 'considering' Venezuela as 51st state.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, and Trump is always straightforward and honest.

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't think Venezuelans would accept being a territory over a state. It's like a woman accepting to be a mistress over being a wife.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, did they accept the kidnapping of their president? Unfortunately, I don't think this fascist administration gives a shit about how they feel about it, and will do whatever it wants.

I'll add that while your analogy clearly makes the point, as a practical matter there are plenty of women out there that happily fulfill the mistress role that do not aspire to wifehood.

[–] panthera_@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Trump probably doesn't give a shit but without the support of Venezuelans, the result could be another Vietnam.