They could've had Guillermo del Toro.
this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)
Games
25040 readers
25 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I would, however, recommend better naming conventions going forward.
but how much did they make from Silent Hill : Pachinkoning?
Psst hey how about a 2D Castlevania while you're at it?
Shit I've been saying that so long I forgot they just made one, hope it's good.
Not quite out yet, but it's made by the Dead Cells folks so unless they've been hit with the enshittificator then things are looking good!
Silent Hill f isn't a Silent Hill game.
Melancholic game with horror elements and clunky combat set in a often foggy world where it's unclear i what your protagonist is imagining and what's real.
100% Silent Hill.
I feel like I'm going to be sorry I asked, but why is Silent Hill f not a Silent Hill game?
Just slapping the Silent Hill name on a game doesn't make it a Silent Hill game. Or even having the same music composer.
Silent Hill f doesn't take place in Silent Hill, and places greater focus on combat than entries in the series prior to Homecoming. Also, Silent Hill is not "trauma exploration: the game series." That was Silent Hill 2, and potentially the original plans for Silent Hill 3 before Konami forced major story rewrites. Silent Hill 1 and 4 do not have those themes at all, and instead they focus on the town itself, its history and events that took place there. Both Harry Mason and Henry Townshend are completely innocent protagonists with no inherent or implied trauma that is explored in the games narratives. Every Silent Hill game since Homecoming came out has tried to copy Silent Hill 2 2001, including its own remake, and failed by placing too much focus on combat due to the camera system and a shift in how the combat works.
Silent Hill f, if it didn't have the name, would be easily called anything else. It isn't a game that without the name is still clearly Silent Hill. Even Homecoming at least had the town of Silent Hill as the setting. f has nothing to connect it to the series except for the potentially white claudia reference, and just surface level similarities. Lake Haven on Steam isn't a Silent Hill game just because it has fog, fixed camera controls, and a trauma exploring narrative. Even if it was called Silent Hill: Lake Haven.
I think Silent Hill f is okay as a game on its own. But its not a Silent Hill game. Silent Hill f is like calling Kuon (the FromSoftware survival horror game) "Resident Evil: Heian Period Japan Edition." Or like calling Call of Duty Infinite "Halo." There may be similarities, but the name does not apply.