this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
5 points (77.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48121 readers
876 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 6 points 1 day ago

Because for a long time in many societies women and children were seen as property of men and corporal punishment was seen as appropriate well after it was decided that the state could not do the same to men who were convicted of crimes. Eventually most societies have started to treat physical violence against wives as a crime, but lag far behind on children.

A huge chunk of the US still doesn't prohibit corporal punishment for children, and everyone can probably guess most of the states that still allow it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporal_punishment_of_children_in_the_United_States

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago

When we moved to the South everyone had to sign waivers with their kids schools indicating whether the teachers could hit them. This was in the 2010s. IDK if they still do it. This is rural Arkansas.

prisoners are a labor asset- damage their ability to output and you've damaged the profits. kids don't make anybody money by being healthy.

[–] klugerama@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm going to propose a different speculation from the other answers -which have some truth - but I don't think it's that deliberate.

My guess is that it's because prisoners are adults that can sue, claiming "cruel and unusual punishment", and win. Kids generally won't. We'll maybe now they would, but less so back then.

Another issue is that despite the basic principle that they both involve "corporal punishment", there's a world of difference in methods and purpose between them. Guards weren't using a paddle to sternly swat prisoners' bottoms, and teachers in school (generally) weren't using billy clubs and fists to beat the shit out of kids. Guards use it for instant compliance and control, teachers use it as (harsh) corrective instruction. Obviously there were exceptions but overall that was the case.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Probably because they thought physical discipline was an effective method of training at an impressionable age but was obviously only a method of punishment once you reached adulthood. Or maybe because enough of the people who made the laws could imagine themselves on the side of the prisoner, but none of them would ever be in the position of being a child again so there wasn't enough self interest for that law to be different.

Basically probably no good reason, but just a misguided vague 'nip it in the bud' attitude carried over the generations.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Where did you grow up?

It was definitely illegal for teachers to assault students in California when I was a kid in the 80s.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I got my ass paddled 3 times before my State cut that crap out. Mr Summerville got me twice, but that was nothing compared to the drilled-out paddle that Mrs Routin kept.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Those were the worst