this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
198 points (95.8% liked)

Not The Onion

21495 readers
952 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"—nick—weird—happened twice—"

only posting this now because apparently nobody has posted this yet and I just found out

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This entire saga has been so frustrating to watch unfold. Portions of the judiciary seem absolutely hellbent on denying court ordered financial restitution to the families. It’s not like Alex Jones has even put forward sound legal arguments. My tinfoil hat theory on this is the judges putting up roadblocks are doing it not because of alex jones or free speech, but because it has a connection to guns. They don’t want something even tangentially related to guns to get a win.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't followed the case, are they Trump judges?

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

The lower court judges that have been involved in the cases have largely been fine and just, but once you get to the appellate level it has become evident how partisan our court system has become. I should note that the fifth circuit (one of if not the worst in terms of partisanship) has now denied standing in this latest appeal by Jones, so potentially this is all coming to an end.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AJ won't give up. Ever. This - not just the site but the narrative he developed around the trial and the attention he gets for it - is his livelihood, he needs to keep it up no matter how ridiculous, petty and pointless.

I hear it's only a small, partial win anyhow.

No matter for AJ: one more time he's getting media attention.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He can't give up, because that would mean that he has to start giving all of his money to Sandy Hook families, and he will not do that.

[–] ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't he already declare bankruptcy?

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 2 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago)

And it was declared that his declaration was not sufficient to ignore the bill. That's why Infowars was sold in the first place

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 79 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why can’t we have cool things once in a while ?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I just typed up a funny comedic reply. Then I read it back, and it came off wayyyyy too aggressive. It came off like I was just being an asshole for no reason. So I deleted it, and tried to workshop it. I wanted something that I could say mean spirited things, in a joking way, but it came off waaaaay more mean than it should have been.

So instead, imagine I sent a reply, where I was mean, but you could tell I was joking about the fact that we can't have nice things because we're all plebs, and not the billionaire ruling class. And then we'd laugh while giving them the finger.

Ok, all caught up? Cool. Back to work, dickhead!

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Didn't have to get all personal about it at the end, bro. I was already having a rough day, now you're just attacking me. :(

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You can, this was mostly overturned

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the families of Sandy Hook can’t get paid because of reasons??

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because you can't get justice without having power.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

When you make school shootings look bad, you make America look bad.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

America is more than capable of looking bad without anyone's help.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Given this all happening in Texas, I'm not surprised.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Two places you don't accept holding court: London and Texas.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

London, Ohio? Or a different London?

[–] Typhoonigator@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Why, is there a second one somewhere?

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

There's one in Texas

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Right but they just got that mostly overturned

[–] MacGuffin94@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago