this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
304 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84816 readers
4101 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 71 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

Anything but parenting properly.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 24 points 17 hours ago

Problem is its not actually about the children. As always they're the excuse. The UK Government will stoop to almost any excuse possible to give itself more surveillance powers - it took 1984 as a goal rather than a warning.

[–] brillotti@lemmy.world 55 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

These laws are not made to protect kids, but to amass power over the people.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 18 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Which is weird because I'm obligated to collect data from UK visitors, but not obligated to share it back with the UK government. This means UK government has essentially mandated that every country collects data on UK citizens. Something opposite of what EU and others do.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago

Don’t worry, when they think they’ll need it you’ll get a polite but abrupt phone call

[–] Brimstone@lemmy.ml 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Just a coincidence world governments all became concerned about kids on the same day 😅

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

There isn't enough terrorism to justify things with that, so children it is.

[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We don't have that many children either, looking at demographic developments.

But fascists will find a way through moral hijacking.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 10 hours ago

We can AI generate pictures of more. See, look how helpless these definitely real children are! We need to protect them from being sexualised- oops, that one shouldn't be in this folder. It's from Grok, forget you ever saw it.

[–] MolochHorridus@piefed.social 22 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised if banning VPNs was the real goal of the law.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 17 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

The whole goal is to track every single person's activity on the internet and VPNs get in the way, so that too.

[–] newton@feddit.online 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 11 hours ago

I shouldn't have to leave the internet, they are the ones who suck!

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 7 points 17 hours ago

That is impossible without a China-level snooping apparatus. And even then it’s only partly possible. This is law made by dumb people.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 20 hours ago

Totalitarian regime speedrun

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Or teaching parents how to parent properly, or cracking down on addictive social media algorithms, or researching the ill affects of pornography, or providing counseling to teens and adults harmed by dangerous materials.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago

One of the porn sites I visit has a pop up when the home page first loads that says

If you have children, implement parental controls.

And a link to a guide for how to do that.