My wife, a graphic designer, just showed me a new feature added to Photoshop that basically allows AI to take a close up portrait and turn it into a full sized photo by generating ideal content around the subject using a few simple prompts. It’s really impressive. All she has to do is touch it up to make sure it’s believable and appealing. I don’t really care, since most advertisement photography is fake anyway, but I worry how propagandists are going to exploit the hell out of AI.

I’m happy to see these results. Although I think the results for the image with the avacado is skewed as I saw that image before in an article and it may have even been the thumbnail image.

Just got a 12.

A few of them actually surprised me even after running a bunch of AI models myself

Excluding the two spoilered images, i got 13/18. A coulple I felt kinda stupid about getting them wrong after the reveal. For the two spoilered images i think i would've gotten the avocado one from the nonsensical highlights and shape of the speechbubble tails, but the pen drawing definitely would've fooled me.

I tried to be honest about the sample images and got 50% right. I think the "drawings" are the hardest because some imperfections are intentional.

I got a 9, while even knowing the two examples in this post, marking way too many as AI generated. But it got me thinking, seeing the deviantart links for the non-AI images: though maybe those are not generated by single prompts, there is a chance of heavy AI involvement in the process, one way or another. So I would actually be curious what the practical/applicable purpose of the survey was.