this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
632 points (99.1% liked)

196

6269 readers
1841 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

alt textThe simple answers to the questions that get asked about every new technology:

Will [blank] make us all geniuses? No
Will [blank] make us all morons? No
Will [blank] destroy whole industries? Yes
Will [blank] make us more empathetic? No
Will [blank] make us less caring? No
Will teens use [blank] for sex? Yes
Were they going to have sex anyway? Yes
Will [blank] destroy music? No
Will [blank] destroy art? No
But can't we go back to a time when- No
Will [blank] bring about world peace? No
Will [blank] cause widespread alienation by creating a world of empty experiences? We were already alienated

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 8 hours ago

Will [____] make us less caring? ...NO

I love how well most of this has aged, but that line there feels very pre-2016 to me, unfortunately.

And that's not even just hinting at politics and world events, but also about how much more we know about those empty experiences from the last line, and how they are meticulously engineered to fuck with people's brains for juuuust a bit more engagement.

[–] Impractical_Island@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Will [Technology] go in my butt? Definitely.

I am not a teenager, btw.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So about making people morons: let me tell you about leaded gasoline....

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It made people violent, and crime rate went up like crazy.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Millions of people dying every year from heart attacks related to lead poisoning.

What is worse is it is still happening. Upwards of 5 million people are estimate to die from lead related cardiovascular disease in 2024. Lead poisoning mainly from gasoline has probably accounted for close to a billion deaths on the high end.

They only recently phased it out of cars with no plans to phase out airplanes.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Leaded avgas is only used for piston aircraft, and most countries use a grade that contains minimal and only for engines that require it.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I think the real issue is even though we have stopped a lot of the pollution our land was so thoroughly drenched in it activities as mundane as burning firewood release large amounts of lead.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/may/15/wood-burning-for-heat-reintroducing-lead-pollution-into-the-air-us-scientists-find

That means it is so blanketed that is going to take global scale remediation to solve the problem. That is mind bogglingly destructive levels of environmental degredation.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

That's why we started asking.

[–] zeroConnection@programming.dev 7 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This needs to be updated for AI in 2026.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 4 points 5 hours ago

It needs to be updated for Music and Art to Yes.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

It's a great comic because it's still up to date

[–] arudesalad@piefed.ca 17 points 1 day ago

I was enjoying this as a new, modern xkcd I haven't seen before until I saw the title

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 87 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A few of those answers need to be reevaluated for "AI"...

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, the problem with this comic is that it somewhat minimizes how <technology> can exacerbate the ongoing problems.

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yep, this comic did not age well. This technology literally targets artists. That's pretty new.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But it will not destroy art or music.

[–] ComicalMayhem@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Often times I see people discuss art and music, and I wonder if they see creative literature as art, or if it's forgotten.

I mention this because AI has been devastating on the literature world.

[–] sydd@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Man I really hope so. But the vast majority of people consume mass produced formulaic media already, I don't see AI helping that trend.

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Isn't that literally the last line, but for art? The average person gave very little fucks about "art" before AI, and most art happened for purely base reasons, like marketing or porn. Fancy shmancy art will continue to exist.

[–] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No amount of people doing that will ever destroy art or music, the only thing that can is reducing artists living conditions enough to where they can't make art.

commercial incentives already ruined art if you're worried about this ruining art.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

i still think it holds up tbqh, ai exacerbates and concentrates many problems but it doesn't really create new ones. content farm slop existed before ai, it's just easier to make now. people who use ai for everything already didn't give a shit about most things. people are still making awesome music and art. there are still many smart, talented people and there still will be. and we were already alienated.

as always, the problem is capitalism

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Blaming capitalism is a cop out at this point. You can't just ignore some very specific problems about a very specific technology then gesture wildly at the world and be like, "if only we didn't have the entire system set up the way we do, if only we had a perfect economy".

Good and bad things can still happen in capitalism. You can't just throw up your hands and say "capitalism" when rat poison ends up in baby food. Regulation can still exist in capitalism and has a proven track record to work. You don't have to replace the entirety of your economic system to prevent AI data centers from being built.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago

You don’t have to replace the entirety of your economic system to prevent AI data centers from being built.

obviously not, and i support people who stop them. but even there, ai isn't exceptional. streaming services like youtube or netflix, or massive online games, also consume a ton of electricity and have polluting datacenters, datacenters used for ai aren't fundamentally different from datacenters used for something else, and yet people only build movements against them when it's ai. don't get me wrong it's good that we're educating people on the harms caused by datacenters. and it's good that many of these projects are being canceled. but datacenters are a problem exacerbated by ai, not created by it.

and you're right that a communist economy would not inherently fix this. maybe there would be less datacenters overall because people (and their governments) would prioritize the health of communities over chatbots, netflix and fortnite. but datacenters are not inherent to any economic model.

for everything else tho?

  • deskilling by ai is a problem because it makes you dependent on an ai company for doing the skill you used to do. without capitalism, there wouldn't be an incentive to make you dependent on a product.
  • ai taking jobs is a problem because under capitalism, you need a job to live.
  • ai slop creations are a problem because they're low quality trash created not for their artistic merit, but for something else, like an ad, or pure revenue (like with content farms). without capitalism there would be no incentive to pump these out as much. people would probably still create them as art, but, whatever. shitty art exists and has always existed. same goes for code.
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works -2 points 18 hours ago

AI is a huge umbrella term, not a very specific technology at all.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

Well, the new problems are the scale of things. For example if humanity had only burned a small amount of oil each year, earth would have been pretty alright, at least until the heat death of the sun. But we started burning way too much and fucked. Same here, a few people being able to create slop kinda just self regulated, but now all of humanity can do it for free and it’s incredibly destructive.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which? They all seem accurate

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

There is already science that shows that people using llms makes them measurably worse, in an incredibly short amount of time, at tasks than they were before using llms.

So, "will x make us all morons? No" actually has some peer reviewed work that seems to imply "possibly NOT 'no' "

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Google Maps also makes us bad at finding our way manually. Are we therefore a moron?

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

If you've offloaded your capacity to navigate, and are worse at navigating, then you're objectively worse at navigating, that's the reality.

What are you offloading to ai? Are you worse at it now? Is it critical thinking? Then yes.

[–] GimmeUrBelt@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Said "science" is a handful of cherrypicked studies that cannot reliably say such things. The US has been in a downward spiral of ignorance for a little while now. And if it is caused by anything, it's a combination of poor schooling, poor parenting, and social media.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Giving simple answers like that without evaluating the context and letting anything go on without restrictions is the path to alienation and corporate dystopia

[–] crimsonpoodle@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

I fear that this is to much of a sensible take for lemmy nowadays. There have always been dumb arguments, but anecdotally I think we’ve been invaded by either bots or the general public. But should use statistics to back this up. Another project on the pile.

[–] GimmeUrBelt@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Welcome to life, boyo

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What industry will VR destroy I wonder now

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

As is tradition

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Big Grass because they can't sell you more to touch

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

Physical scale modeling. There's already VR headsets actively used to preview 3D models of things like vehicles and architectural blueprints.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

aged like 🍷

also woah heyhi dear chloe! <3 🥕

oh umm.. i - .... ~i~ ~see~ ~ur~ ~posting~ ~a~ ~whole~ ~bunch~ ~of~ ~anti-ai~ ~stuffs~ ~lately.,.,,.~ no- - -

nothing wrong with that! just umm---....,, ~just~ ~noticed~ ~that.,...,.~

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

hiiii maria!! :3 🧡

i hope you’re doing well!

i have nothing against the technologies behind ai, you know, large language models and all that, the tech itself is just that, a tech

i do have a big problem with the way it’s used tho, how companies are forcing its use, how they (the companies) and their tools make people lose their jobs, fill the internet with low quality stuff, lead to sloppy work all over, and try to make us cognitively dependent on them, all the while polluting the environment with all of this… but like i said in another comment the root problem here is capitalism, none of the problems of ai are exclusive to it

it’s a tool, like a knife, you know? a knife can be used to stab people, but it can also be used to cook delicious meals. it’s just that with ai there’s been a ton of stabbing and not much cooking…

imo ai is fine when it’s very specific tasks run locally that are double-checked by a human, like isolating a voice track in a song, generating automatic subtitles (and cleaning them manually afterwards, this part is important, looking at you youtube), isolating a subject from its background in a photo… but generating entire images, vibecoding or writing essays? that’s where we enter stab territory imo, especially when you do those on a big datacenter

at the end of the day, if you don’t agree with me that’s fine. i’m not gonna pretend i’m a beacon of moral purity either. i’m not vegan, i drive a car, and i am the descendant of colonizers, living on the land they stole…

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way I like to understand it is that I'm pro machine learning, but anti "AI." None of what we have now is really that intelligent; AI is just a marketing buzzword to sell people on the idea that a tool can replace labor entirely. They despise workers and want to believe that AI can get rid of them. It's why they keep throwing money at AI development despite it providing no clear economic benefit. As masters, they want to rid of the need for slaves, because in our current reality they are nothing without them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

^ ^ ^ woag most reasonable ai take :o ^ ^ ^

🥕💖

(gosh those yt subtitles yesyes those suck sometime...)

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Title text: 

'Will [ ] allow us to better understand each other and thus make war undesirable?' is one that pops up whenever we invent a new communication medium.

load more comments (3 replies)

Did age well

load more comments
view more: next ›