this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
113 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42678 readers
304 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Brave sells Origin to strip added features—a $60 one-time fee (free on Linux).
  • Origin removes email aliases, Leo AI, VPN, Wallet, Speedreader, and more via a toggleable panel or standalone client.
  • You can buy Origin on Brave Premium or enable the panel at brave://settings/system.
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funny - are there any other known instances in the history of software where you have to pay extra to remove actual features?

Also, don't use Brave.

Who is the target audience for this? Without those features isn't Brave just like any other Chromium browser?

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It being free on Linux is pretty interesting.

[–] vapor_body@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lmao it's like the play store tax

[–] Midnight1938@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isn’t that just helium browser

[–] Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the sense that they are both Chromium? In that case it's just Vivaldi as well.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago

a couple minutes to click through vivaldi's settings will turn off all the annoying stuff (similar to firefox, but firefox is quicker to 'set up'). i've never seen it re-enable things like microsoft loves to do.

vivaldi is what i use for a chromium-based browser when i need to check web client 'compatibility'; and i like that you can customize the toolbar (like you can in firefox).. i move the back-forward stuff to the right side of the address box, and add the separate search box (so suggestions can be enabled in it but off for searches in address bar).

[–] Midnight1938@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Afaik Helium is unbraved Brave

[–] iza@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Not really, it has some patches from ungoogled-chromium, brave, and others. But it doesn't use Brave's ad blocker, bundles uBlock Origin instead.

[–] balian@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is Brave not FOSS? How come nobody has already made a debloated fork of the browser?

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

It already is a bloated FOSS fork of chromium.

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

i actually work in software security.

grapheneos has talked about integrating shields into vanadium (and by extension, trivalent) which i would love. shields imo is a very top notch implementation of an ad blocker and is better than ublock origin in every way due to how it blocks in ram with rust rather than in userspace like ublock. brave does pretty well at integrating many things into the browser so that the user isnt tempted to install extensions, which reduces attack surface. i consider email aliases, automatic darkmode (can be enabled via chrome flags) on sites, and a built in adblocker (not an extension, it must also work on videos) to be critical for user experience, and ideally via no extensions. currently only brave offers each of these stock, which is very unfortunate. plus it has better sandboxing, there are many exploits to harvest fingerprints on many corporate sites that circumvent sandboxing in firefox and read other tab data. basically, the only options are brave with minimal changes, mullvad browser with no changes, or tor browser with no changes, and you should not open more than one tab on any firefox browser. the last two are not great for usability every day due to no automatic darkmode, among other features.

i think the best way for brave to improve would be maybe to include something like sponsorblock in the browser as well and then work hard to cut off providing extensions altogether, as extensions are a main source of fingerprints becoming unique and data leaks. and of course remove all the crypto garbage.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago

There was a fork, it was called braver. I think it got sued and then shut down? Not too sure.

https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=EQm0k1QobZU

[–] AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (8 children)

What browser should I use then thats not brave or Firefox?

[–] ragas@lemmy.ml 10 points 22 hours ago

Why not Firefox?

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 13 points 1 day ago

Waterfox, librewolf

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 16 points 1 day ago

you should use firefox and turn off the 'ai' crap (one toggle) if you don't want it. a few more clicks turns off the 'sponsored' stuff and 'telemetry'. if that's too much for you, then librewolf. zen, perhaps, if you want something a lil' different.

[–] lonksawakening@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

I use Librewolf so I don't have to worry about Mozilla adding things and enabling them by default

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Konform, Zen, Floorp are solid ones to check out

[–] Aralakh@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

+1 to Zen and Floorp. Haven't come across Konform before, thanks!

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Safari/Epiphany.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I use Vivaldi, european and against the AI (and also crypto) hype

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most of those features are opt-in anyway, so there's really little to "remove". That's just a way for them to fund the development without resorting to deals with Google and the likes or selling users's data.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why the fuck would they need to fund development when they're funded by the antichrist himself?