this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
198 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8730 readers
204 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A bill signed by Gov. Jeff Landry on Thursday mirrors other laws passed in red states amid a national effort to ban climate lawsuits against oil and gas companies.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 day ago

Doesn't that violate the equal protection clause?

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago

Ah, stupid laws made by crooked men.

Ain't that America for you and me? Ain't that America? It's something to see.

Would this allow for a rico case against those states?

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The damn law is on theor side. Time for war, then.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

If climate change is fake, then it should be an easy for the defendents to win any lawsuits... right?

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 9 points 1 day ago

& kill on, GOP, kill on…

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These evil fuckers will see this planet burn if it lines their pockets.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 8 points 1 day ago

"Will"? Brother it is already happening in front of our very eyes. You are living through an extinction.

Welcome to the anthropocene.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

Ah, yes. Perfect example of the State protecting people.

Guess it's time to sue the State for violating its own constitution

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does that mean that we can sue everyone who supported the bill? If we can't sue the ones turning the water bad, we can surely sue the ones carrying it, right?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

Nope. You cannot sue the legislative body for legislating. You can sue to block or nullify laws, but you can't sue individuals directly who are acting in their capacity as lawmakers.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Never give any money to someone you can't sue.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

One big problem: if enough states so this, there could be incentive and precedent for it to become a federal law in the future.