this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
91 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2206 readers
614 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _fryerDan@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] inari@piefed.zip 26 points 3 days ago

The upside:

The strategic frame, in Jompy's closing assessment: "The loss of the vast Soviet legacy stockpiles means the capability to quickly regenerate after high attritional warfare won't be there anymore for Russia, and they'll have to change their approach to mechanized warfare." Russia is committing the recoverable end of its Cold War inheritance to this one war. There will not be another.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but modern Russian tanks break down a lot, these ate going to be a nightmare. Plus the armor is so old munitions probably slice through them.

Plus diesel is a problem all over Russia now.

Still better for Ukraine if they weren't there.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Do the newer tanks run on something else than diesel, or did you just mean that fuel is a general problem?

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I meant that Ukraine is decimating Russian oil production.

I feel like I read somewhere that modern tanks run on jet fuel?

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Really? That's interesting, I just ~~lookup up~~ checked wikipedia and indeed they can use it. TIL.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought jet fuel and diesel are similar.

[–] chocrates@piefed.world 1 points 2 days ago

I dunno really. Abrams have a turbine engine that is optimized for jet fuel but can run on "most" fuels.

Most tanks have a diesel piston engine.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

Guys with cars on blocks in the front yard are rejoicing

[–] cenariodantesco@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Help me understand, if Russia is on the ropes, how come from time to time I see posts of articles, where Russia is building stuff near NATO borders, and the neighbour countries are preparing for possible hostility, with what? These bad boys?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It's a fair question. The thinking is they'll stop here and rearm with their very active arms industry rather than throw their war economy into the shitter.

There is no doubt they have squandered their USSR inheritance though.

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 3 points 3 days ago

They are bringing the literal archaic tankies
。・゚(खਉख)・・。ヴァノヽノヽノヽノヽノヽノヽノヽ

[–] Steve@startrek.website 2 points 3 days ago

Highly effective I’m sure