How much of our water, electricity, tax breaks, and public land does it use?
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
345 points (96.5% liked)
Technology
85492 readers
4001 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Nice try, OpenAI sales reps.
But how much is the data you’re giving them worth? The other option is don’t give them your money or your data. The Qwen 3.6 MoE model with OpenCode is running pretty well on my RTX 4060 gaming laptop. According the Codscus YouTube channel, it even runs decently in as little as 6GB of VRAM.
Please do.
Use it all.
Bankrupt these shit companies and help burst the bubble
Sounds like a trap. Big cruises are said to have buffets, but yet, they’re still floating.
This is their strategy, they want people to use it, get hooked, replace parts of their day-to-day life with it, make it to difficult to "just go back", then hit them with the actual bill.
They won't go bankrupt unless their backers walk, and their backers are still quite confident in this strategy.... because it's working.
But no one is going to be able to afford a $14,000 subscription for slop.
Gov will bail them out and use our taxes to do it
I wonder what companies that have integrated AI into all their workflows and processes are planning to do when the times comes to pay real price for the tokens.
spoiler
Nothing. They aren't thinking ahead.
That’s the next CEOs problem to solve while the current one is enjoying his golden parachute and sailing around the world. Right now, number is going up!
The companies don't pay the price, they just pass it on to the consumer with a markup. Right now they just try stuff out to see what people really use AI for. Eventually the "AI features" will be cut back to the parts that really make them money, once they have to pay the real price.
All the investors know it's a massive money sink right now. The goal isn't for "everyone" to get to use AI.
It's to get so many people used to using AI that businesses like law offices and hospitals and other corporations so ingrained and built around having AI, while leaving so many graduating college students useless without AI, that businesses will be reliant upon it, no matter what costs of it they will have to absorb.
In five years there won't be a $200 plan. There will be a $15,000 plan per person and businesses will pay it because they won't be able to do well without it.
I think there may also a horizontal scheme as monopolies take on a global scale. Those businesses that sell in bankruptcy due to high tech costs could be gobbled up by the biggest AI-native competition. It's a leap but maybe in a decade your optometrist is replaced by an ai kiosk with a remote technician?
Maybe then he would give me the prescription I paid for....
See gym and carwash memberships
Is there a carwash membership???
Yeppers. Sign up for a monthly subscription with your cc, and no real way to cancel! "Unlimited"* car washes, so why would you ever cancel? You're gonna want a clean car
This is just Gym Economics though, right? They work on the assumption that only a small number of their member will actually use the service heavily, but the overwhelming majority will turn up to use the treadmill a few times then never visit again.
Ok but it would take 70 users paying $200 to cover the cost of $14,000. So if one person maxes out their usage, there needs to be 69 users who do not use their account at all but are still paying. And that’s just the break even point, still no profit for the AI company.
I’m struggling to believe that many people would pay that much and then underuse the subscription. It seems far more likely to me that this pricing model isn’t sustainable.
Even worse, that calculation is based on that their API pricing is currently providing a positive margin. From what I have seen and heard at this point, API pricing is at best breaking even.
The total I spent on AI is $0. How much AI can I get for that?
I would prefer none, but there's AI being forced on us everywhere these days.
If you keep opening a new private tab and starting new conversations with chatgpt, your usage including uploads is free!
Also you can just switch to any other provider when you finish your free daily quota!!
Quite a bit if you actually wanted to use it. Opencode offers enough usage for free that you could create full apps from it lol, caveat being that their free plan usage is being used to train the models you use. But then everyone is probably doing it on their paid plans as well.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Nice try, I still ain't gonna pay. OpenAI can go bankrupt without burning my money
If you've got a toy project that you want "AI" to give you a hand with, do it now.
Pretty soon all these companies are going to have to pay for all that investment in compute resources they've been busily soaking up over the last few years, and then they're going to have to pay back their investors, and then they're going to have to try and make a profit
This is the golden time for cheap commercial AI. Already the noose is starting to tighten, and it will never again be as cheap as it is now.
Another way to look at it would be "if you've got a toy project to practice coding without AI on, do it now" before that is the only option.
Yeah they've been pushing Claude code at work for us non coders jobs to come up with stuff that would help us. We've gotten a few surprisingly useful programs out of it, but our assumption is perfect them now before pricing goes through the roof. We are also only creating programs that do not require ongoing AI use. Just a bunch of relatively simple things that make our jobs easier.
I am still pushing my boss for some local hw as I think as a group we've spent a couple grand in the last month and that is the least of my reasons for wanting a local llm vs subscription.
This is the golden time for cheap commercial AI.
I suppose, but small open weight models with more advanced coding frameworks optimized for them are catching up fast and you can do it privately at home on a mostly affordable consumer graphics card.
If you have solar it's basically free, minus the graphics card CapEx you may want for gaming anyway, as well as some setup time and a bit of patience.
Yes, it's trending in that direction, and I've been experimenting with pretty small models on my PC as I don't really have the hardware to go large. If you've got the coding chops to set it up, it's definitely something to keep an eye on.
There's actually scope for someone to set up / sell local compute hardware+software packages, similar to all those coin miners. Give the end user a way to update models, or push models out to them or something, it seems it would be a good middle ground between manually typing code like a peasant and total corporate AI apocalypse.
There’s actually scope for someone to set up / sell local compute hardware+software packages, similar to all those coin miners.
I think that'll be a viable target in the future, and have little doubt some are jumping on it already. However, I also think it's too much of a moving target currently, a near optimal setup changes almost entirely month to month.
I find myself targeting last months setup, as then there's enough literature out there to get it set up in a day or two and most of the kinks have been worked out. Otherwise, I lose too much coding time to debugging the bleeding edge.
IMO, at the moment, if you're not capable of setting it up yourself you likely don't have the experience to use it reasonably safely nor an adequate understanding of its limitations. You'll find yourself using more time fixing the blunders than you gain, and / or the project will spiral out of control in maintainability, security, readability, and so forth. You could get away with small projects written as 'write only' code ala Perl though, keep the prompts and tests, when it needs to change rebuild with the newest hotness. Inefficient and unsatisfying though.
What's your setup, if I may ask? I'm using llama.cpp router with vscode kilo.ai and qwen3.6-35B-MoE-MTP as a model mostly. It's surprisingly good as a coding assistant, but I think you have to know what you are doing and know your stuff(aka be an experienced developer) to make it useful. just letting it vibe leads to crap code
load more comments
(2 replies)
Sounds like it'll never be worth it.
In five years once this RAM nonsense is over you'll be able to run a comparatively high quality local LLM for very little money. I can't see how these companies will ever make their money back.
If manufacturers are willing to sell components to us in five years that is.
Of course if the colllapse happens before then the story might be different…
I’m slightly optimistic that manufacturers will return to the retail market eventually. Every AI company is racing to hyperscale right now but there will be a point where the infrastructure is built and at that point the growth will slow down quite a bit. In that scenario there will be ongoing demand for components to be replaced as they become obsolete but I can’t imagine the demand will be the same level it is right now as everyone rushes to build.
That’s assuming this all works the way they want it to. If the economics aren’t viable and the bubble bursts…
“Hyperscale” is utterly meaningless MBA jargon at this point. Equivalent of verbal slop from industry shills and CNBC/Bloomberg sell side simps.
Their Datacenter buildout doesn't work they want to. Most projects are very much delayed, and those that even started getting built are over budget. OpenAI and Anthropic will collapse in the next years, and this is coming from someone who absolutely sees the good things about the technology itself.
OpenAI and Anthropic will collapse in the next years
Stop, I can only handle so much good news!
There is no way, absolutely NO WAY to recuperate the amount of cash burnt on those two companies, and that is not even counting the amount of AI Startup whose cash is currently flowing towards to those two.
How about bailouts? GPT integration with Visa? IPOs sucked into funds? There's a lot of money they can and will try to vacuum, don't you worry about that. And banks will do their damnest best to help with all of that - just look at SpaceX.
At least they failed at getting into index funds for now.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
The actual cost to OpenAI is likely much less. The number in the article is calculating the API cost that a fully maxed out subscription would incur theoretically. The API token cost, however, is far above the actual computational cost.
I disagree - the analysis takes as a basis a very, very generous margin of 75% on API prices. There is no way they have that much of a margin, this is wishful thinking.
And every single user who maxes out their 200$-subscription burns more cash than they take in from 70 subscriptions that lie dormant.
I was talking to one of our cloud architects at work yesterday. They did a test and just ran in "asdf" to a chat prompt, and were able to trace the costs. It was 12 cents.
I could totally see AI costs getting out of control very quickly. Doing something like a Copilot formula in an Excel spreadsheet is easily going to run up hundreds of dollars of costs eventually.
load more comments
(4 replies)
The last calculation I got (from an AI) is that 1M USD performance today, in hardware, is 100k USD in a year. Make it it what you want. But this is what companies are gambling on. Users now is profit later.
Have you looked outside? Not after rampocalypse
view more: next ›