this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)

Friendly Carnivore

102 readers
20 users here now

Carnivore

The ultimate, zero carb, elimination diet

Meat Heals.

We are focused on health and lifestyle while trying to eat zero carb bioavailable foods.

Keep being AWESOME

We welcome engaged, polite, and logical debates and questions of any type


Purpose

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don't farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you
  6. No LLM generated posts . Don't represent machine output as your own, and don't use machines to burn human response time.

Other terms: LCHF Carnivore, Keto Carnivore, Ketogenic Carnivore, Low Carb Carnivore, Zero Carb Carnivore, Animal Based Diet, Animal Sourced Foods


Meta

Carnivore Resource List

If you need to block this community and the UI won't let you, go to settings -> blocks you can add it.

[Meta] Moderation Policy for Niche Communities

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR - EAT MEAT

Driven by perceived health and environmental benefits, initiatives to remove red meat from recommended eating patterns are increasingly being implemented in United States institutions, including schools and hospitals. While these efforts aim to address important issues, they may inadvertently lead to unintended consequences, particularly regarding essential nutrient intake for certain populations. This perspective considers the nutritional value of red meat, examines its potential health benefits, and highlights nutritional risks when intake is reduced or eliminated. Red meat is a nutrient-dense food that provides highly bioavailable protein and several essential micronutrients often lacking in the diet, including iron, zinc, and vitamin B12. These nutrients can be limited or absent in many plant-source foods as well as in some animal-source foods. Red meat’s micronutrient profile is especially valuable for young children and women of reproductive age, including pregnant women. In addition, the protein density of red meat is beneficial for individuals managing obesity and older adults at risk of sarcopenia. Many epidemiological studies suggest potential associations between excessive red meat consumption and increased risk of certain chronic diseases, but this evidence does not conclusively implicate red meat in the development or progression of chronic disease. The nutritional and health implications of reducing red meat consumption must be balanced against the low certainty of evidence used to discourage red meat intake when making dietary recommendations.

consumers are routinely confronted with messages to not only reduce red meat intake below current consumption levels but to eliminate this whole food from their diets. The present perspective proposes that this messaging could cause more harm than good to public health if implemented in public policy or dietary guidelines. Individuals at risk for undernutrition and obesity may benefit from increased intake of key nutrients by eating animal-source foods, including red meat

Full Paper - https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1525011

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Midnight@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Meat and Livestock Australia supported D. Rodgers and M. Kavanaugh in the creation of this commentary

DR is a paid consultant for Meat and Livestock Australia and accepts speaking and travel fees for meat and livestock producer groups including the Canadian Cattle Foundation and Instituto Nacional de Carnes (Uruguay)

Even after taking money from cattle industry groups they still have this in it.

Plant foods undoubtedly confer a health benefit, contributing soluble and insoluble fiber, micronutrients, as well as various phytonutrients and bioactive compounds, that are limited in most animal-source foods

Maybe not the right propaganda for the carnivore sub.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Science needs funding. Funding is always aligned to what the research is about; Coca cola is hardly going to sponsor a "meat is good" paper, though they do provide money to try to prosecute doctors for providing nutrition advice to sick patients

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe not the right propaganda for the carnivore sub

If you've got a paper talking about meat, metabolic health, ketones, metabolism. I'll post it. Pro or con I'll post it. I won't agree with it probably, but we can talk about it. Do you have any suggestions? Actual papers you have read, my only requirement is you've already read the paper and are willing to discuss it

The point of this paper is to talk about the undue vilification of meat with weak and perhaps even doctored evidence. However, people can be healthy eating plants, it's not necessary but it is doable - I freely admit that. Carnivore is a tool, it's a tool people should be aware of, but not everybody has to use it.

[–] Midnight@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Other articles posted here imply fiber is deleterious to a proper diet, something which is the nutritional equivalent of the flat earth. I'm sure I could post articles, but arguing over the basic science of nutrition seems less fun than goading said flat earthers into buying atomic clocks.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fibre is tolerated by most people, but it's not necessary. I welcome your primary source indicating it is actually essential

[–] Midnight@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I didn't say it was essential. I'm saying it's beneficial. But that sort of rhetorical reframing is the reason why posting here is unproductive.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 2 days ago

I didn’t say it was essential.

Great, then we are in agreement. Fibre is not essential for human health, that is the zero-carb position. Why all the fuss?

I’m saying it’s beneficial

Depends on the context - in a zero-carb diet (i.e. a proper diet) fibre just bulks up stools and diminishes nutrition from proper food (meat) so you would need to increase the meat consumed. In a high-carb diet fibre diminishes the impact of the carbs (which is a benefit i agree), and bulks up stools.

[–] xep@discuss.online 3 points 3 days ago

Why is it beneficial? Again, primary sources that you've read only, please.

[–] xep@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago

This is not a community for propaganda. It's a community for talking about metabolic health and a lifestyle that supports that. We have a scientific bent, and science progresses by being challenged. As Jet said, if you've got a paper you'd like to discuss that you've read, please post it.