this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
61 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6743 readers
299 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After more than 17 hours of deliberation, a jury at Birmingham crown court has failed to reach a verdict over whether four pro-Palestine activists committed criminal damage at an arms factory.

Iain Evans, Hana-Yun Stevens, Frank Sherman, and Hisham Alkhamezi were each accused of criminal damage at a factory owned by Moog, a US aerospace firm, in Wolverhampton.

During the trial, the jury saw footage from helicopters and CCTV cameras which showed the defendants crashing through the site’s front gate and damaging solar panels on its roof.

Prosecution lawyers presented this as an open and shut case given the defendants admitted in court to occupying the roof in order to shut down the factory’s production line. They said the trial “is not about Israel, it’s not about Palestine… It’s simply about whether they unlawfully damaged property”.

But the jury was also shown a social media post demonstrating that the activists’ goal was to disrupt the supply of UK-made fighter jet components to Israel.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 31 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is also in response to a similar recent case where the judge added on terrorism charges after the jury already decided the defendant was guilty of minor charges.

Perhaps this jury was aware of that and voted against conviction because they don't believe these activists deserve terrorism charges.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 12 hours ago

Inshallah/ojalá

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Does the UK have jury nullification?

For that matter, wondering about EU, as well.

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 0 points 2 hours ago

I don't think any country in the EU has jury trials

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 29 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, Palestine Action was also acquitted by a Jury but then the UK regime did a retrial where they censored all details about the case to the jury, and (like this case) only asked the jury whether the protesters engaged in vandalism. Then they used a legal loophole to slap terrorism charges on top of the guilty verdict.

There's no low the UK regime won't stoop to for Israel so they'll likely force a retrial here as well.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 11 hours ago

Heaven forbid!

It will be lovely, good, and pure if this case gets the other convictions vacated, somehow.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, we call it jury equity. This has been a point of much contention in regards to protest cases in the recent years, starting with some XR cases, JSO ones and now Palestine Action ones. People have been arrested for holding signs telling jurors their rights, using wording from a plaque that's in one of our highest courts. Here's some background from a group that's protesting against the quashing of this right and potential removal of jury trials: https://defendourjuries.net/about-doj/

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 12 hours ago

Ohhh, brilliant share! Thank you!

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 12 hours ago

The prosecution can say what they like, if you feel they did nothing wrong then not guilty is a pretty reasonable choice to take.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

“fails”