this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
4 points (100.0% liked)

Cuba

373 readers
11 users here now

Cuba


Community dedicated to discuss everything related to Cuba. Its culture, its language, its politics and its people.


Rules:

  1. Posts must be in Spanish or in English.
  2. Add a flair in the title of every post.

List of flairs:

[News] [Culture] [Discussion]
[Question] [Request] [Guide]

Cuba


Comunidad dedicada a discutir todo lo relacionado con Cuba. Su cultura, su idioma, su política y su pueblo.


Reglas:

  1. Las publicaciones deben estar en español o en inglés.
  2. Añadir una etiqueta en el título de cada publicación.

Lista de etiquetas:

[Noticias] [Cultura] [Discusión]
[Pregunta] [Petición] [Guía]

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
4
What do yall think (www.reuters.com)
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml to c/cuba@lemmy.ml
 

I sincerely do feel like the cuban citizens interviwed. I really dont know. I hope this is to make it possible to lift the blockade in some way, but i rarely trust these kinds of privatization reforms that come from the pressure of capitalist countries. If they help the people in general its ok ig, but i hope they wont be completely permanent. This is something i need to think about and sincerely wanted to hear from others

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

My take done short and lossy: the US just wants Cuba and Venezuela to become like China. That should give us hope.

The medium version is that so long as Cuba doesn't lose control of the commanding heights of the economy and the government isn't controlled by private interests, they'll be fine. It's more dangerous having compradors and spies more integrated into your economy, but the conditions in Cuba don't allow for independence. It's very difficult for any major manufacturer to get goods there, and the US blockade makes it economically untenable. Cuba can't say no to the US if the US is willing to starve all of the people there.

[–] CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

ye, btw venezuela isnt absolutely turning like china from how its going

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago

I know. It's not looking good at all. But it's clearly an attempt to prevent a more significant loss so I'm just holding my breath

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This is the first I’ve heard of it.

It could be coming from imperial pressure, but I wouldn’t assume so. They may be taking a page from China as the article suggests. The devil’s in the details, which I don’t have.

[–] CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

ye idk why the article is so short.

[–] ILikeToMeow@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't trust any non Cuban Government controlled source of information as accurately reflecting what the Cuban Government is doing or trying to do, western media is overwhelmingly controlled by Capitalist interests (that includes reuters) and they have been trying to destroy Cuba for a long long time, one weapon of the Global North (and the US especially) is massive amounts of lies and misinformation, and they've done this many many times. As psyops are constantly being used by the hegemon against Actually Existing Socialist countries (as well as ones that fight back and resist like Iran and Russia) everything heard not from the leaders of Cuba itself should be read with a whole BUCKET salt.

Edit: P.S. also Gusanos are a thing, if the Cubans being interviewed are not actually in Cuba itself, that is a bad sign, another issue is if complex political questions are being asked to total randos rather then actual Theory experts of Cuba's Communist Party (don't know it's name) they may be fishing for useful misunderstanding. Sorry I haven't actually read the article myself so hopefully this is still useful.

[–] CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

I dont think they were Gusanos but yeah, we cant always trust western media, obviously, especially on AES