this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
534 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

85615 readers
3187 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Flock, the automatic license plate reader (ALPR) company, exposed some of the license plate cops were looking for and the reason for doing so.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 36 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The irony of this site demanding data from me in order to read the article

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand. Don't you want to feel known? Understood?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I am an unknowable eldritch abomination and i like it that way

[–] Ragallos@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago

I respect and support your eldritch nature, I hope you inspire madness to those who gaze upon your incomprehensible being.

Damn also happy Cake day

[–] artyom@piefed.social 178 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Im shocked that the company who was openly broadcasting live feeds to the public internet also exposed the details of searches!

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 26 points 14 hours ago

What a supprise indeed!

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 163 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Remember it's not just a license plate reader. There should be a law against calling it that.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 21 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

Could you explain what you mean further?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 72 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

They don’t just read license plates. They analyze faces/pets/distinctive clothing to ID people, scan nearby WiFi and Bluetooth signals to track devices, scan distinctive features of vehicles (dents, scratches, bumper stickers, etc) to track them even without a clear license plate, etc… Calling it a license plate reader vastly downplays their capabilities.

It’s like someone calling a fully automatic high-powered machine gun “a rabbit-hunting gun”. Sure it could be used to shoot rabbits, but that’s vastly understating the capabilities.

[–] Doublenut@lemmy.zip 18 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Atlanta has them in the middle of parks too far from and facing away from parking lots to read any license plates.... they're there to use facial recognition on children playing on park equipment.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 12 hours ago

Oh wow.this is just blatantly anti-police. You think cops shouldn't get to masturbate, just because they're cops?

[–] cheesemoo@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

And they probably sold the people in charge on the idea that it's to "protect the children" 🤮

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's good to point this out, I don't drive but I forget they could probably track my bike still based on it's distinctiveness, calling them license plate readers really does obscure the insidiousness well. We've heard about automatic license plate readers for years, they weren't like this so it is really disingenuous to call them such.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

oh yeah. like, if the police in town have figured out who i am from my trike, there's no way the ALPR hasn't. that thing is fucking distinctive. and i wave hi to everyone (the ALPRs with one finger)

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

It used to be finger prints people needed to worry about. It so far beyond that now.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

ground squirrels. we use the atf tag (it's not mine, i don't know what it's called) machine gun to hunt ground squirrels. i mean you have to kill them for environmental regulation and agricultural control anyways, might as well have some fun.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 96 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

They're little computers with cameras that capture everything. I think some of these types of devices run Android. Many are very poorly secured, like the article suggests. A "license plate reader" sounds like it only reads license plates, these are surveillance platforms, with cameras and microphones. They can be accessed remotely to do more than just read a license plate.

I'm thinking the person says that couching it as a license plate reader is disingenuous, because it doesn't really convey the gravity of what the devices are capable of.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 29 points 15 hours ago

They're Android. And they're hella insecure. And hilariously jankilly implemented. I'd be ashamed if this was my states state surveillance infrastructure.

Related videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp9MwZkHiMQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago

Yes, ALPR is a term used for the purpose of public relations. It does not accurately describe the technology.

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Any "license plate reader" has a camera and can be used for anything. This was true before flock.

I didn't know "any license plate reader" also scanned your phone as you went by and added your dog to their database to better identify you as an individual.

They don’t just read license plates. They analyze faces/pets/distinctive clothing to ID people, scan nearby WiFi and Bluetooth signals to track devices, scan distinctive features of vehicles (dents, scratches, bumper stickers, etc) to track them even without a clear license plate, etc… Calling it a license plate reader vastly downplays their capabilities.

It’s like someone calling a fully automatic high-powered machine gun “a rabbit-hunting gun”. Sure it could be used to shoot rabbits, but that’s vastly understating the capabilities.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

'Can be' and 'are' are two completely different categories of things.

[–] deadcream@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You think USA government agencies never thought of using public surveillance cameras to spy on people before now? That's like basic stuff for any domestic security agency, in any country. The only difference is that now the data is shared with regular police with all the incompetence and abuse it implies. You have always been spied on.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

You think USA government agencies never thought of using public surveillance cameras to spy on people before now?

No. I do not.

I think allowing a private company access to that kind of data, without any meaningful restrictions on what they can do with it, is a lot different than the current situation of 'spy agencies can spy for the government'.

If I'm a bad guy and I can get access to a Flock (or Palantir, fed by Flock) subscription then I can do bad guy things a lot more effectively. Can you think of any bad guys who could afford such a subscription?

Who owns that data and what rules it falls under is important. The government needs a warrant to obtain cell-site location tracking data, but Flock can sell a subscription to obtain that same data to anybody who can clear an ACH transfer.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

On top of what everyone else saod, FLOCK can track your vehicle as you cross several plus states. I would say 90% if not more highways and freeways have them across the US.

Cool tool for stopping real crininals, bad tool on a civil rights side.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago

Pretty much everyone is a real criminal, it's just that most crimes are so minor that they are ignored (see: jaywalking, speeding, putting ice cream in your pocket). In some cases, the laws exist to provide a fig leaf for the powers that be when they want to fuck with someone.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

People don't understand "real" criminal in deeply intertwined with regular people and regular cops and politicians. Most "regular" naive people think of criminals as some mythical thing but they are everywhere. It's almost as if the "straight" legal life is mirrored 1 to 1 with the dark side. And that part of maintaining the "legal" side is to market that the dark side is a myth, even though is there, part of the "legal" sides politics, economy, and culture.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is basically what happened when people whine about the authority only take action when crime are commited. So now everyone are being watched in every corner.

[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Idk even know if it's that. This system works people against each other. They create the barrel of crabs and profit off all the bullshit as people claw their way out to get to the rights that a human should naturally have.

Everything is business. And suffering creates reason. It's a system.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago

Cool? Arguable. Useful? Not in practice.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 54 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It uses machine learning algorithms to identify vehicles independently of the license plate. Leaked documentation has also shown they operate facial recognition tech, in direct contradiction to the lies they tell the public. Flock is fundamentally an evil company, delivering the infrastructure for totalitarian rule, wrapped in the alluring false promise of eliminating crime. They know exactly what they are doing, which is why they are so heartily embraced by fascists in government, from the top all the way down.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So the people that like these don't mind their own privacy being invaded? Perhaps they already know if caught doing something they will get a free pass?

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Generally the ones putting them in are on the side of the system that gets a free pass wherever they go. And the majority of the public that allows it to happen fall for the "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" fallacy.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

i mean, i can bow and scrape my way into free passes for the occasional thing (it's usually in exchange for extraordinary services rendered years ago let's be real), but don't think for a second i want those flock fuckers in my country.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They're just public cameras. They're notoriously used to capture and record the locations of vehicles via their license plates but realistically they totally could flip a switch and start using them for things like facial recognition overnight.

[–] Doublenut@lemmy.zip 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

No switch to be flipped. Already used that way.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 0 points 12 hours ago
[–] dorumon@lemmy.cafe -1 points 9 hours ago

I mean I’ve known about this for awhile lol.