this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
11 points (86.7% liked)

Climate

8753 readers
418 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/55161437

Over the past few years, millions of new electric vehicles have hit the roads in China, with the majority adopted in its richer cities.

While electric vehicles have huge benefits compared with the carbon emissions from petrol- and diesel-fueled cars, the total amount of electricity needed to run so many vehicles is significant.

This drives up total electricity generation across the shared grid network, affecting poorer, fossil fuel-dependent cities—which in turn endure higher pollution from the carbon emissions created in generating that power, as well as the additional cost of measures to mitigate that pollution.

The researchers say their findings, published in Nature Cities, could apply to richer and poorer cities in countries worldwide.

[...]

Senior author Professor Zhifu Mi (UCL Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction) said, "Electric vehicles are one of the most important pathways for decarbonizing transport, and their rapid growth in China is a major opportunity to reduce national emissions.

"However, our study shows that the carbon benefits of electric vehicles depend strongly on the power system.

"Decarbonizing the grid must go hand in hand with promoting electric vehicles, while policies should ensure that less developed cities do not bear disproportionate carbon burdens."

[...]

The researchers found that the growing popularity of electric vehicles is increasing power demand in the richest cities that have been the biggest adopters.

However, through the interconnected power grid, much of their surging electricity demand is met by power produced in nearby less developed cities that still rely on coal or other fossil fuels, minimizing the carbon-reduction impact of electric vehicles and putting a greater environmental and economic burden on these poorer cities.

[...]

The researchers found that while it appeared the country's 20 most economically advanced cities accounted for 80% of carbon emission reductions, 136 of the cities they analyzed (nearly 50%) have become 'carbon importers'—cities that have increased their carbon footprint by shouldering the power generation burden for electric vehicles used elsewhere.

[...]

There have been significant economic disparities in the adoption of electric vehicles. About 75% of China's electric vehicles were concentrated in just 10% of cities in 2020, predominantly those with the highest GDP per capita. This means the cities adopting electric vehicles fastest are generally not the same cities producing the electricity and carbon emissions.

Mi said, "Electric vehicles are necessary, but not sufficient on their own. To maximize their climate benefits, we need cleaner power grids, better carbon accounting, and compensation or support mechanisms for cities that bear transferred emissions."

[...]

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 day ago

This is framing this as an EV problem when in reality it's just a case of shitty infrastructure in rural areas, like the rest of the world.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago

Almost like cars are the problem, not where the emissions happens.