Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
No. I most often see the AI generate python to do things it can’t directly. But this is a huge question: that program could do anything, do you let it?
How do you safely use an AI, anyway? You start with guardrails, like limiting it to read-only, you tell it to plan only, make sure that any data is also held in a safe place, when it prompts you to let it run something, try to understand it first ….. but in order to get any benefit from AI, you have to let it do potentially dangerous things.
Any language that is turing complete is equally powerful, you should compare languages based on featuresets and syntax. Compiled vs interpreted is probably the biggest thing for you to pick between.
From an AI safety perspective, the language used isn't that important. An analogy might be asking what kind of hammer is good and safe for building a bomb. Some hammers might let you get the job done easier and/or faster, but ultimately you can do it with any of them (and get into long arguments with hammer fans on which one is the best). Similar to the hammer example, "powerful" isn't a meaningful quality either; is a hammer with a nail extractor thing more "powerful" than a heavier one you can swing harder?
There is lots of nuance, of course, but it comes down to "best tool for the job" rather than one being more "powerful" than another.
Programming languages are pretty interchangeable at the heart of it, so you're not gonna get consensus on "most powerful," and no, it's not safe to use with ai because llms are not healthy and safe for humans and other living things.
Thank you. I don't know how computers work at all!
If you're curious about diving deeper on why I say languages are "pretty interchangeable," the key terms to read up on are "Turing equivalence" and the "Church-Turing thesis."
assembly language
Define "powerful".
I confess I don't really know how this works.
I say, if you're interested in kinda hardware start with an Arduino (C++). Or just generally curious about messing around with code, start with Python