this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
390 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85833 readers
3727 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The lawsuit is small in scale so far, but if the court accepts the plaintiffs' claims and formally approves it as a class action, it could expand. Bathaee Dunne, the antitrust law firm representing the plaintiffs, is aiming for a class action representing all general consumers and businesses that purchased products containing D-RAM. The firm previously won a case alleging collusion in Google's digital advertising. If the plaintiffs ultimately prevail in the class action, the defendant companies would have to pay triple the damages.

The fact that Samsung Electronics and SK hynix have previously been found guilty of collusion in the United States is also a concern. Both companies were found to have engaged in price fixing in the US in the early 2000s, resulting in large fines as well as prison sentences for executives. However, industry players including investment bank Jefferies forecast that the lawsuit will not affect memory prices at least until the end of this year.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Fuck RAM manufacturers but are they actually price fixing though? It seems like AI companies just said "hey, we'll give you a hundred million billion trillion gazillion schmillion dollars for all the RAM you will ever produce" and they said yes

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

How it will end:

Anyone trying to prosecute it will be fired, and then mysteriously doxxed.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How much was the fine for the last price fixing lawsuit?

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

730 million dollars and 9 years of prison time between 16 executives

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago

$43. That'll teach em.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Interesting. The story I've been hearing is it's a supply problem caused a massive demand for the Nvidia AI chips and the ultra-fast RAM they require.

I just saw a report from SK Hynix (that triggered chip stock selloffs) that they were dialing back on production for the next generation NVidia chips. The market figured that was evidence of soft demand.

Turns out that was because those were delayed, so they decided to build more of the lower speed RAM, which I think is the stuff consumers are needing. Working from memory here, so details are likely off.

Anyway, the problem may be more about producing for the most profitable market rather than price fixing.

I look forward to the outcome. It will be nice to know the situation from an objective source.

Full disclosure, I own shares of FKLR which is an ETF of the South Korean market index that is dominated by these two companies.

It's doing poorly just now due to that report I mentioned and a bunch of other things.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Working from memory here

Nowadays that's a pretty expensive way to work

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I also own shares on memory manufacturers but i am flexible to sell my shares if the companies turn out to be total sleaze bags. There are plenty of other companies in East Asia regions that are killing it in the EV and AI boom that are not sleazy.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks like the previous fine was 185 million.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Literally pennies compared to the billions made.

[–] GasMaskedLunatic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Thanks. I'll edit this into the post.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

You don't actually need to engage in collusion to fix prices and silently agree not to compete. You just need to not be an idiot.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Because greed.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Exactly. It's like watching the gas station across the street and quietly setting your prices to the same thing. The moment you set it one cent lower than the other guy, it's a race to the bottom and everyone makes less money.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Watch them say "well we just won't sell to the US anymore"

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Don't think you grasp which side has the actual leverage here...

The US market is the one that has driven the truckloads of money that have resulted in the memory vendor stock increasing over 10-fold.

Even a pretty severe compromise or fine is totally worth it to keep the money hose going.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's where most of the AI data centers are

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Exactly, that's why it's the ultimate threat...

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You think they’d destroy their own companies as a threat?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

No no , thats just standard operation. As long as the “owner” and shareholders ends up with more money than they started they do not give a fuck.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

They would not end up with more money, they’d lose a whole heck of a lot just to make a point

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but to their own bottom lines

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

In the short term..but the US would fold pretty quickly...

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 14 hours ago

Micron is American, I think they'd be in trouble