You can tell the diagram is fake because the female skull doesn't have a pink bow permanently attached to it
196
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etcโฆ)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etcโฆ)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:

The fact it's doing the goddamn DreamWorks face is the cherry on this
The male skull is noticeably flatter at the front because cavemen tended to punch each other in the face a lot
In the physical anthropology world we'd use terms 'grassile' and 'broad' to avoid gendering a piece of bone. Unless there'a fleshy matter or a baby skeleton wedged in the pelvis, (and even then...) you're not going to be absolutely sure.
a fleshy matter or a baby skeleton wedged in the pelvis
Sweet Lord Jesus
The fossil record hears ye. The fossil record don't care.
I hear that's one of the reasons for facial hair too
They can tell because the CAD models used for Male and Female skull creation are notably different.
The whole basis of phrenology is just the names of the CAD files.
males-whites-ubermensch.stp
female-.stp
They never stopped to check if the files are actually different aside from the name though...