this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
181 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

43043 readers
126 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most communities are not the sole community related to their topic, there are really often other communities on the same, or similar topics.

An example: there are a tonne of art related comunities, but only a small handful of them have links to other related communities.

It would be great if there was more of a culture of propping up semi-related communities. This would be particularly useful for helping more niche communities get rolling.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I agree! If you DM the mods or make a meta post, I feel like they'd happily add a section. Sometimes they aren't aware of the other communities

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

If anyone messaged me with a suggested addition to the sidebar for one of my communities, it would make my day. This is fedi, not reddit -- be friendly with your local mod.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago

I only really run one, but I'd be ecstatic if someone made a good recommendation for a related community.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 6 points 2 weeks ago

Seconded! Also should help with discoverability overall, still one of the weaker points of the fediverse.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

100%

I'd love some suggested communities related to !selfhosted@lemmy.world!

Recommendations are welcomed

[–] rimu@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

If Lemmy automatically generated a list of related communities then mods wouldn't need to manually maintain a list.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah, this can lead to having many sparsely populated communities. It can discourage new users, and fediverse adoption generally.

For example, if you look in one of the several audiobooks communities you would conclude that the fediverse is a ghost town. However, the actual "community" is in /c/books. If you post about audiobooks in both you won't get any engagement in the audiobooks communities.

After the great reddit API influx a few years ago a bunch of communities sprang up but were quickly abandoned, contributing to this problem.

There's actually a community discussing these dead communities and how to go about merging / closing the dead ones, but I can't remember what its called.

Of course in some cases with larger communities it might make sense to split communities into different topics, but there's very few communities large enough for that to be genuinely warranted.

[–] Blaze@quokk.au 6 points 2 weeks ago

!fedigrow@lemmy.zip

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

sidebars need a lot of love. No one should really be making a community until they are ready to explain what their community is about and not only link to other communities using the proper linking for federation but also wikis and resources and such. I appreciate people running communities but if little effort is going to be put in I rather just not have the community. Now granted some communities do a decent job with the sidebar but its certainly not the norm in the fediverse.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Idk. You also gotta know that people are going to come and join in before you know it's worth the effort

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

why? Theoretically people should have an innate interest enough to make a bit of effort worth it. I think a lot of people want something to be a thing but aren't really into it enough to be making a community about it. Which is fine if they don't make one but if they are going to half ass one into being it would be better for them not to.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, you're right. Minimal useful explanation is necessary. It can always be expanded later too

[–] chicken_hahi@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

One thing what i miss from Reddit is that user recommending related subreddits or suggesting subreddits where the post would fit in.

I see this in the fediverse sometimes but it is much rarer.

[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I disagree, in my experience this tended to lead to the whole. "This interpretation of our niche is better suited for our sister subreddit so your post has been removed"

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

If there are clear distinctions between them, this is a good thing IMO. If I sign up for a community, I want to see content that's on topic. If I see too much unrelated stuff, I'll leave. If I want to see both types of topic, I can just join both.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Way ahead on this heh. Did this a while back on our communities. Piefed batching of cross posts helps a bit with discovery. And this should as well.

[–] lambalicious 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would love to see some more artistic and visible appreciation for related communities in the sidebars. Something like the old webring / affiliate banners that websites had in the '90s (88x31 IIRC), even!

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago