this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
521 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30329 readers
2229 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Look as much as we want it to happen we need to wait till after midterms. Multiple times we have tried but it has not budged. Dont reveal you are not on their side.

Also military officials should be the ones calling for impeachment because we need them to stay in positions of power in case of anything

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 115 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Newsweek has an image, credited to YouTube/Jessica Denson:

Impeach, Convict, Remove

There's a Spotfund by "DOOR LLC", I'm not familiar with the platform or the sponsor.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Idk anything about DOOR LLC, but one must admire a soldier actually committing to his oath.

One must also hope that if this one soldier is standing up to make this statement, that there's thousands more who share the sentiment too, and he haven't heard from them yet.

With any luck, this'll become a trend.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 days ago

Veterans have been speaking out this whole time. The media probably tries to keep that quiet, and alternative streams of information probably don't focus much on what vets say, unless they're specifically vet-focused in which case most people in leftist spaces probably don't hear about them. But vets have been speaking up all along.

It's more rare for someone active duty, because not only are they prohibited by the UCMJ from speaking against the President, VP, or SecDef (since they're in the chain of command), but also it's prohibited to take part in any political activity in uniform. The reasoning is basically that anyone in uniform is a representative of the military itself, and therefore not supposed to take part in partisan activities or express a political opinion in the capacity of being a service member.

Active duty can go to protests and do all that, but they're supposed to do so in civilian attire and not bring attention to their military status.

So my thoughts are a lot of servicemembers are opposed to what's happening, but even if they're protesting they're keeping quiet about their military status. Also to avoid bringing attention to themselves, cause if their chain of command finds out they can make their lives hell even without hitting them with the book.

So what this guy is doing is ballsy. He could very easily be stripped of rank, lose his commission, or be sent to the brig. Honestly the latter is most likely because the other two would take an act of congress since he's an officer, but with this congress I wouldn't be surprised to see it.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

That man is going to be breaking rocks. I hope, instead of something worse; as didn't the current administration purge military leadership to install loyalists?

Fuck yeah its a great photo though.

§934. Art. 134. General article

Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special, or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I doubt it, at least not for very long. He may get convicted, especially if it's a military court, but the next Democratic president will pardon him.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Yupp only gotta engage in back breaking grueling labor at a military prison camp for 3 more years or so!

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I hope he is pardoned.

Prob if he was enlisted, officers typically get the kids gloves. My money would be on forced retirement, if they really want to make an example of him they might dismiss him after being court marshalled.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] o0evillusion0o@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Finally, someone in the US military with integrity and a backbone.

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He won't be in there much longer unfortunately.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah buy he will have a by paycheck once trump is ousted. And then s allow him to avoid doing what revolution trump is planning.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 33 points 3 days ago

Can I be on his jury?

We have to make Jury Nullification so common, that wrongly arrested people won't take plea bargains, because they stand a better chance with juries that have shown themselves willing to fuck up political prosecutions.

We need to start talking about Jury Nullification, and preparing potential jurors for the massive wave of prosecutions that is coming. We just saw a group of suburbanites sentenced to decades in jail for exercising their 1st Amendment rights, as ANTIFA Terrorists. We're going to see a lot more of that after the Midterms, when they can't get what they want from Congress, so they will have to pivot to controlling and punishing through the weaponization of law enforcement.

They've got all these profitable concentration camps filled with people who are bringing in a daily stipend from the government. Now that SCOTUS has given permission to deport them all, they MUST be replaced, and "ANTIFA Terrorists" are the perfect boogymen.

They tried to prosecute a guy for starting the big California fires, and 10 jurors said No, a pretty clear indication that the government didn't have a case, and counted on the jury to just go along with it. Unfortunately, two of them did go along, probably MAGA CHUDS, but ultimately it was a mistrial.

Many federal cases have been shot down at the Grand Jury level, something that was incredibly rare until MAGA came along, and arrogantly thought they'd force everybody else to play along with their atrocities.

MAGA is now using the system to attack normal Americans, not just other politicians that we generally hate anyway. It's hard to get upset when a Comey or Bolton get slapped around, they deserve it, but when they start throwing soccer moms in prison for decades, just because she had Leftist poetry in her car, it's time to start destroying the system.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 75 points 4 days ago (11 children)

That takes guts, Major Jason Watson.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We need more of this, and higher ranks.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, where are all those generals that were fired so ignominiously? Why aren't they speaking out?

I have been harboring a fantasy that they're deliberately lying low. They know MAGA is virtuosically incompetent, and if they stay quiet, MAGA will forget about them. In the meantime, they are talking to each other, and making plans for the moment that Trump decides he's staying in office, no matter what the elections say. Then they'll make their move.

Maybe it's a fantasy, but these guys spent their entire lives devoted to protecting this country, and they know a traitor and an enemy when they see one. Their silence speaks very loudly. I think it's a much better chance that they are planning, and not just sitting on the lanai, sipping cocktails as the country they defended burns down around them.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah, where are all those generals that were fired so ignominiously? Why aren’t they speaking out?

Because they don't want to lose their 7 figure 'consultant' job at a private military contractor that every general officer has waiting for them when they retire.

Most generals in the modern US military are jut like CEOs and billionaires; ie they simply wouldn't get that high on the latter without being a slimy piece of shit.

[–] LuckyDevil@piefed.social 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

A few bullet points is a pretty sad excuse for an article. Here is one with more information.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 25 points 4 days ago

He who saves his country breaks no laws

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

U.S. military regulations impose strict limitations on service members' political activities, especially in uniform, and Article 88 forbids officers from using contemptuous words against the President or Vice President.

As a civilian I don't think calling for legal impeachment is contemptuous, nor is peaceful First Amendment Activity. The GOP-majority congress has let us all down, choosing party and Trump over country.

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

As someone unfamiliar with Air Force ranks, I tried to look up how big a deal the rank of major is. Is this something that is after a year or two in the service? A decade? Are there hundreds of majors in the Air Force? Thousands? Tens of thousands?

[–] Ithral@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 18 hours ago

Its a middling mamagement role, typically you can't get your own command until one rank higher. It's about 6-8 years of service starting at O-1. There should be a few hundred of them in the Airforce.

However he did a big no no, specifically making political statements while in uniform if the pictures here are accurate. He could be facing time in prison over that if it goes to court martial. So effectively he's tanked his career, and risked his freedom when he could have done just one of those things. Middle management small dick syndrome if iv'e ever seen it. Willing to bet he found out he wasn't getting promoted or something to do something so assanine in order to pick up sympathy points for a political run later.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fairly big as they are very close to the top. You'd have to go to a military academy and be in for over a decade.

very is relative.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Generally, an officer starts with that first gold bar then moves on to the second, silver bar after finishing school (4 years). Sometime within 2 years after that they’re likely to move up again, and after that it becomes politics where it could be anywhere from 2 years to the rest of your career before another promotion depending on how much people like you

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

TIL the US Air force uses army ranks for its officers instead of Carpet Cleaner, Squadron Leader, Wing Commander, Tailfin Director or whatever the Commonwealth uses.

[–] LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

A true patriot.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Announcing your coup isn't a good plan for success.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 4 days ago

There is no article. It's just bullet points..

load more comments
view more: next ›