this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
5 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

6780 readers
138 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 5 points 12 hours ago

This smacks of "won't anyone think of the children" censorship. And with oligarchs buying up media organizations, it seems like they don't want mind share competition.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

He should have stayed mayor. No-one with strong authoritarian leanings has any place in the leadership of a democratic nation.

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 3 points 23 hours ago

Clap your hands! Throw a chair! Peel a parsnip! Iron your trousers! Sieve the greens! Strangle a fox! Pipe the buttercream! Stub your toe! Cancel your Netflix! Andy Burnham!

[–] ReCursing@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck's sake. So he'll be a massive disappointment as well then?

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 hours ago

My money is on worse

[–] minty@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Same shit different smell huh

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No! We should allow giant corporations to experiment with the minds of children!

[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Are you in favour of all adults having to provide ID to access the internet? Because that's the policy that you're supporting.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -2 points 23 hours ago

Yes.

Bring back pornographic magazines.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 4 points 21 hours ago

So regulate the corporations not the children.

Make them remove algorithms and hold them accountable for bad content on their systems.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Absolutely not. We should regulate them into transparency and prevent them from experimenting on children.

...but that's not what he's doing is it? This is punishing children by excluding them from their community because he lacks the courage required to stand up to American techbros.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Implying that other media companies, like TV or magazine companies, do not target children and don't influence their minds? And have done so since long before the Internet became available to children? Or what now?

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago

So, you see no difference between phones and magazines?

It's like saying we never asked for licenses to drive a horse and buggy, why demand them for cars that go twenty times as fast?