this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
294 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30405 readers
2300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Didn't the vikings reach America before these crazy European religious freaks came? Shouldn't the US follow the Old Norse Paganism instead?

[–] BabyVi@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

To be fair, by that time many of the Norse explorers were already Christian.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

This sounds like more Seven Mountains Mandate bullshit.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (4 children)

And describing early European conquest as motivated by ‘Christian religious fervor’ frames Christian evangelism and Christians’ flight from religious persecution in Europe as an intent to subjugate the New World, rather than flee life-threatening persecution, spread the good news of the Gospel, and share the love of Jesus Christ with those in this new land.”

A lot of people still believe that shit.

The "persecution" that pilgrims faced in Europe was that they were a small extremist minority and didn't have the numbers to make everyone follow their rules.

When they'd try to use violence to make the masses follow their rules was the only time they faced any kind of punishment for their religious beliefs.

So they went to "the colonies" where they believed they could be the majority if they had enough kids, which meant coming down hard on women's rights.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The “persecution” that pilgrims faced in Europe was that they were a small extremist minority and didn’t have the numbers to make everyone follow their rules.

So much this. They created a lot of problems here, too, IIRC.

Xtian extremism like theirs is precisely why this nation was founded as a secular nation. It's not like the Founders didn't notice things like the Inquisition, which was still going on in their lifetimes.

If the Constitution was written by unhinged zealots like the Pilgrims, their Jesus would be enshrined in the Constitution (the Constitution has no mention of the character of Jesus from the fanfic called "the" bible), and this place would be much much different.

[–] jesusactuallyhateshorses@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A lot of people still believe that shit.

Because we are still just apes. "Smart" apes but not that smart.

Adults still believing in Santa Claus, but in a toga, baffles me. But then I remember we are still those upright apes who could see above the grasses.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Falling for propaganda doesn't make someone stupid. That's the entire point of propaganda...

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

The point of propaganda is to make you stupid. Everyone has been exposed to propaganda of one form or another throughout their life, anyone is susceptible. You don't have to be stupid to fall for it, but when you do, you are a little (or a lot) more stuoid.

Not stupid; gullible. Ape-like.

The "propaganda" is thousands of years old.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I bet from an outside perspective, the US really does seem like religious extremists from the beginning.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, from an inside perspective, too.

It IS religious extremists.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

It's actually waves of religious extremism. Ebbs and flows. It can be, and has been, fought before. The problem is that it never fully dies out.

I'd like to think that reason can eventually win. If only because the religious extremists keep taking it to, well, extremes. This drives people away from the belief, because why the fuck would you ever believe in the shit the extremists preach?

They tell you that you're worthless, that you should bow and scrape while they ignore every single tenet of their own religion. Holiness becomes removed from actions and becomes and excuse for terrible behavior.

But then the extremist are forced to back off, or their little sect of greed worship dies out when the grifter claiming to be a preacher dies or gets sent to prison, and the cycle is primed to begin again when a new sect of Christianity pops up to start recruiting in an area, often by first attacking non-Christian education options.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a hard time parsing that quote; does it say that MAGA wants to paint early immigrants as pure-hearted missionaries with no material motives, oppressed in Europe because they were "too good"?

The "rather than" confuses me I guess. What's the difference between the 1st and the 2nd part? It says "persecution" in both.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A brain dead MAGA wrote it, so they have to always show horn things in...

And describing early European conquest as motivated by ‘Christian religious fervor’ frames (Christian evangelism and Christians’ flight from religious persecution) in Europe as an intent to subjugate the New World, (rather than flee life-threatening persecution,) spread the good news of the Gospel, and share the love of Jesus Christ with those in this new land.”

It's just weird to say twice in a single sentence that Christians had to settle America to flee persecution because it is weird to say the same thing.

Like:

Describing (Version 1) framing (version 1) as (version 2) when it's (version 1) is dumb because it's (version 1)

Is toddler logic, they're not presenting evidence or drawing logical conclusions, they're just repeating their claim over and over because if they repeat it enough some people will believe it.

You can see the same strategy unfolding right now with Graham Platner, a bunch of people just keep repeating his guilty and has to drop out because no he can't win...

But they can't explain why they think he's guilty, why he has to drop out, or why he won't be able to beat one of the least popular senators in America...

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

You had me up to your endorsement of Blue Maga. I see you like your politicians made by old money in an unholy propaganda combination of military and anti-establishment (oxymoron alert)

I didn't like him from the start when he had an ear piece in being fed lines from political operatives. So contrived it hurts. I suppose you agree with these wealthy people that this mercenary with a covered up Nazi tattoo is ggggrrreeeaaattt!

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's toddler logic

I'm glad you understand, then

That's the point. It's supposed to be simple without thinking because the people it's aimed towards are also simple without thinking

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It's all about the vibes. You just have to pray to supply side Jesus, yell "tHiSCoUnTrYwASFoUnDeDoNjEsUS" until you are blue in the face, followed by several MERIKAS to wind down .

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Thanks, I'm just as confused, but at least I understand now that that's OK.