this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
31 points (91.9% liked)

Geopolitics : News and discussion

427 readers
4 users here now

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm guessing this is a result of 3 factors:

  • Hormuz closure.

  • Russian refineries getting blown up by Ukraine. (And then Russia using up what fuel it does still have in an attempt to alleviate shortages and keep the front lines supplied.)

  • The US emptying out their strategic reserves in a desperate attempt to prevent gas prices from going even higher due to the former two.

[–] gaiussabinus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

For a product with inelastic demand, that is very close to zero if you define zero as disruptions.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a pretty big amount at the bottom of the SPR that's unusable sludge.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would you not rotate stock? I don't know why any supply would be first-in-last-out. We shouldn't be describing a reserve that is one container the size of a lake.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

https://www.energy.gov/hgeo/opr/spr-quick-facts

"The Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), owned and operated by the U.S. Department of Energy, is a federally managed network of four sites located along the Gulf Coasts of Texas and Louisiana. Each site contains deep underground storage caverns carved into natural salt domes, engineered to securely hold large volumes of crude oil."

There are 61 total caverns.

Also Saudi Arabia / OPEC selling low to undercut other sources to establish dominance on the market.

[–] dRLY@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I wasn't aware of it before I saw articles talking about how we are using so much of the SPR currently. But apparently using so much of it actually can cause the caves/caverns to warp and start various chunks of the walls to fall. So even if it isn't factually about to run out, it is a big issue to be creating the "emergency" requiring pulling from it.

I guess it is a big win for the private companies that get the sellers market in government needing to fill it back up (and of course basically double-dip in profits from higher prices for normal use).

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The truncated Y-axis makes it look worse than it is

[–] formlessoedon@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Now compare the SPR & diesel stock levels to the 1970 oil shock! I will explain this tomorrow or some shit. Probably

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, better get fracking... 🙄

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

or forcing poor countries to

[–] marretics@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Usually I would say that's a good thing as I would read that to mean that you guys are less dependent on oil now, so you need to keep less storage of it.

Looking at what's going on in the world I don't think this is the result of any good development and could severely fuck up your economy.

Good luck!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Even demand destruction is a win if you're radical enough (as an environmentalist or urbanist).

[–] Orcocracy@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What kind of monster picks dark blue, dark red, dark green, light green, light grey, and also the same fucking light grey again as the colours for their line graph fucks sake

[–] formlessoedon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

This is a Worlder-tier spam reply I don't give a fuck

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

1050000 is not 0 though

[–] m532@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago

If it continues like this, mid-2027 they're dead