this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Earth

13249 readers
160 users here now

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/63708

President Donald Trump's administration on Friday paved the way for letting US corporations destroy the habitats of endangered species by rescinding a longtime interpretation of the Endangered Species Act.

As reported by The New York Times, the Interior Department and the Commerce Department announced that they were narrowing the law's definition of what constitutes harming endangered species.

Whereas the law has for decades been interpreted as protecting endangered animals' habitats from significant "modification or degradation," the administration said that offenders would have to directly injure or kill an endangered animal to be considered in violation of the law.

"The change could open the door for fossil fuel companies, agricultural interests, land developers, and others," wrote the Times, "to disturb or even destroy the habitats of vulnerable species."

The Endangered Species Act has been interpreted as protecting animals' habitats for decades, and that interpretation upheld by the US Supreme Court in 1995.

Environmental advocates expressed horror in response to the rule change, which they said would put endangered species at unprecedented risk.

Kristen Boyles, attorney for Earthjustice, vowed that the administration would face legal challenges for its rule change, which she said would jeopardize endangered animals' ability to "raise their young, or search for food."

"Let’s be clear: There is no support for the Trump Administration’s rule—no scientific support, no legal support, no public support," Boyles said. "We will see the Trump Administration in court."

Ben Greuel, wildlife campaign manager at the Sierra Club, called the rule changed "a direct attack on the foundation of the Endangered Species Act" that, if kept in place, would put species "on a path to extinction."

"This rule ignores that reality in an unlawful attempt to open the door for corporate polluters to degrade vitally important habitats, wildlife be damned," Greuel emphasized. "The Endangered Species Act is a bedrock law that must be followed."

Tara Zuardo, a senior campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity, pointed out that "habitat destruction is the number one threat to endangered species," while calling the Trump administration's new policy "a death knell for America’s wildlife."

"If animals don’t have a place to live, they can’t live," Zuardo said. "Spotted owls, Atlantic salmon, Florida panthers, and thousands of other species need protections for the wild places where they make their homes."

Andrew Bowman, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife, accused the Trump administration of embracing an "erroneous and nonsensical interpretation" of the Endangered Species Act that he vowed to challenge in court.

"We intend to fight back with the full force of the law," said Bowman, "to defeat this attack and innumerable others by the administration on the statutes and regulations that protect America’s cherished wildlife."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Athena5898@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

There are other things I think we need to gut instead.

[–] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

Death to America

[–] CupcakeOfSpice@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can I bulldoze the White House or Mar A Lago and all nearby McDonalds then say I didn't directly injure or harm Trump? Like, how is removing not only their homes, but the whole ecosystem that keeps them alive not directly killing them??

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago

It operates on the same logic that says that someone who dies starving and homeless because they lost their job wasn't technically killed by capitalism because a capitalist didn't personally put a gun to their head and shoot them.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would’ve taken me at least a month to post, now I just need to find the tab I opened and close it catboy-salute