this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
44 points (95.8% liked)

Privacy

10296 readers
527 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Secure messaging is about much more than end-to-end encryption. Metadata collection, open-source transparency, independent audits, default encryption, account requirements, backups, and jurisdiction all influence how private a messaging platform actually is. This comparison examines the major privacy-focused messaging apps and discusses the trade-offs each one makes instead of trying to crown a single "best" option.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

THE FULL SCORECARD

Rank App Score Verdict
1 Cwtch +21 Zero compromise
2 Briar +21 Zero compromise
3 SimpleX Chat +11 High privacy
4 Threema +9 Strong privacy
5 Session +8 Strong privacy
6 Signal +7 Pragmatic standard
7 Wire +4 Moderate
8 Matrix +3 Moderate
9 iMessage -7 Poor
10 WhatsApp -11 Avoid for sensitive use
11 Viber -13 Avoid
12 Telegram -14 Avoid despite reputation
13 Discord -15 Public chats only
14 RCS / SMS -21 Zero protection
[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

A comparison of messaging systems that doesn't list XMPP?

[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I use SimpleX and one of the features I really like is the self-destruct code. You can have one pin that allows you to open your chats like normal, but if you input a self-destruct code instead the app opens like normal but deletes all information in the background and wipes your profile. All the user sees is an empty profile and empty chat history.

So if you're at a protest or something and MUST have your phone, you still have a safeguard against communication snooping. Say your phone is confiscated and they obtain your device lock, there's nothing they can do about the self-destruct code. "I just downloaded the app in case I ever needed to use it for sensitive data with my wife, but we never ended up using it."

I do wish that they allowed keypad scrambling though. Even stock Android allows lockscreen pinpad scrambling to avoid fingerprint code hinting.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

does it also have a deadman switch

[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not sure what you mean, but you can set it to immediately lock when the device is locked. So all it takes is for the screen to sleep or manually lock the phone.

I set mine to immediately lock but there's options for 5, 10, 30 seconds, etc.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be an auto-self destruct if you take more than X amount of days between successfully entering a code. So, like, if you died, it’d wipe itself after a certain number of days automatically.

[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Ah, not to my knowledge. But for me, considering everything is locally encrypted, thats sufficient. I'd imagine that the prospect of accidentally wiping the contents with an incorrect passcode would delay any attempts to crack it.

[–] akwd169@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Signal no longer requires a phone number afaik

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] akwd169@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Your right, problem is ive been hearing about how theyre going to remove the phone number requirement for years now, apparently:

2020:Signal is actively working on removing the phone number requirement. It's a hard... | Hacker News

2024:Signal's Adding Support for Usernames, Removing Phone Number Requirement - CNET

That last one is some real deceptive marketing bullshit

Signal is removing the requirement to use a phone number for conversations

So you still need one for registration

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where would Delta Chat fall in this test?

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Matrix for me, because I don't know anyone that have an active account, so I'm not messaging anyone. The best privacy

Then there's Signal

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

I put up my own Matrix server! It's great! I can use it to talk to myself, but with extra steps!

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A self-hosted matrix server (https://stateofsurveillance.org/guides/advanced/matrix-element-self-hosting-guide/) would be what I trust the most.
Signal is what I try to get friends to use instead of Whatsapp and FB Messenger.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I like to think folk would trust me, an enthusiast, with absolute sovereign security for their information over superficial centralised security from a corporation. Well, as it is a Matrix server doesn't need any personal info from a client, just the bare essentials from their device to make comms work.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 3 points 1 day ago
[–] newton@feddit.online 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

SimpeX chat , lxmf ,xmpp , ratspeak ,sideband ,meshchat ,nomad network .

Never heard of Linddun ,will give it a try.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I dont think it is an app itself, but a scoring system to grade the privacy of existing other apps more empirically vs. their marketing BS.

[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Linddun is basically 7 parameters for privacy. Yes a bit less known true

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago