this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
636 points (99.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32329 readers
709 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zonefive@sh.itjust.works 74 points 2 days ago

My apologies for bringing insane US politics into a non-political post but I saw an example of this just today.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Apple does the thing with screens where they cycle between more shatter resistant and more scratch resistant and tout "3x more shatter/scratch resistant than the previous model"

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 14 points 2 days ago

typical apple tactics.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Mrwhosetheboss and mkbhd did a collab video called "how tech companies lie to you" its at 13:43

This article talks about the video

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yup. It's a thing.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 days ago

Not Apple though. Apple just hand waves the numbers.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Don't forget "up to..."

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

One of the things that stuck with me most from my BI classes was a lecture on faithful intuitive representation of data, for instance the distinction between percentages and percentage points, choosing the right charts for certain figures, why some people use logarithmic charts and why they are bad.

He also brought up the usage of y-offsets, the thing mentioned in the post. He showed similar (but a little less dramatic) charts of significant changes that looked a lot less impressive once you "zoomed out" and set the lower bound to zero.

He then made it very clear that he did not want to see any of us do that in the exam.

I encountered it later at work, where someone had generated a chart of some quality measure that had a manager perk up because it looked unstable and decidedly mediocre. You can guess the issue. The actual figures were a lot less damning, but at a glance, they looked very wrong.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

False. They also stick fake numbers in there with zero regard for consistency.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

just keep adding decimal places until you see a difference

I also love meaningless things like

"3x more effective at remowing plaques" or "10x kore tougher on stains". Yeah sure buddy it is...

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

That’s a difference of 100.000.000Hz, so it is totally legit to show it like this. /s

[–] trainsrkool@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

very odd its not going 3.18, 3.211115, 3.222224, 3.233333 must be before the ipo announcement