this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
18 points (95.0% liked)

Global News

6762 readers
209 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Aggression against recruitment officers has become increasingly threatening, police say.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr7k5ngde3vo


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rion@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No one wants their life wasted because of the state.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's true. But the state doesn't have much of a choice either. Any state that refuses to defend itself under active invasion will not last long. As usual, the root culprit is Russia for creating the situation in the first place.

Edit: Your statement is extremely ironic considering you've previously stated you would commit suicide if the US ever invaded your country, rather than live through it or raise a finger.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Feel like ML's been pushing this 'Ukraine is doing evil conscription!' all through tonight.

Yeah, war fucking sucks. So Russia should stop doing it upon Ukraine.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is an insane take. BBC is probably as far from authoritarian communists as you can get ideologically.

But even more the article is literally written by Sarah Rainsford who was expelled from Russia because of her reporting.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The facts are not in question. The narrative some people push or imply about those facts being in any sense Ukraine's fault is.

Yes, Ukraine has to make some shitty decisions because they are facing an existential threat from a hostile, much larger nuclear-armed neighbor currently occupying a quarter of their country and engaged in a brutal and relentless hybrid war against their government, culture, and civilians.

That's not Ukraine's fault. That is Russia's fault. If you're angry that Ukraine is unfairly conscripting Ukrainians and those Ukrainians are then getting killed on the front lines, and I think we should be, because it's true it is very unfair: direct your anger at Russia, who is directly at fault for all of this unfairness and for the fact that front lines exist where these conscripts are getting killed. We would all like to see it end. Russia can start the process at any time by ending their illegal war of aggression and occupation, ceasing fire and going back home. Returning all the Ukrainian children they kidnapped would be the next step. Then, maybe they can start negotiating peace by figuring out how they are going to compensate Ukraine for everyone that was killed and everything that was damaged or stolen during their illegal invasion.

These are not "maximalist war goals", these are fundamental requirements for justice and lasting peace, at least if you believe in a world where "might" does not make "right", which I strongly argue is something we all should all insist on at all times.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Yes, Ukraine has to make some shitty decisions because they are facing an existential threat from a hostile, much larger nuclear-armed neighbor currently occupying a quarter of their country and engaged in a brutal and relentless hybrid war against their government, culture, and civilians.

None of that is in dispute.

If you're angry that Ukraine is unfairly conscripting Ukrainians and those Ukrainians are then getting killed on the front lines, and I think we should be, because it's true it is very unfair: direct your anger at Russia, who is directly at fault for all of this unfairness and for the fact that front lines exist where these conscripts are getting killed.

Why the double standard? We accurately call out Russia for sending their conscripts to a meat grinder, but saying the same about Ukraine is off limits?

Russia is at fault for starting the war, no ifs, ands, or buts about it. And Ukraine has the right to defend its sovereignty and conscripting is one of those tools, but necessity of it doesn't negate the harm that causes and people are allowed to criticize that state action.

And to be fair, they are actively trying to reduce those casualties by replacing people with robots on the frontlines.

[–] RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Maybe you need to bring it to another level to understand?

If 2 women each kill another person; one in self-defence of a rape; one because they had a nice watch she wanted.

Now, don't get lost in trying to build in details that make it more ambiguous, just examine if you would truly continue to call out the victim who merely didn't want to be a victim.

Why the double standard? We accurately call out Russia for sending their conscripts to a meat grinder, but saying the same about Ukraine is off limits?

Yes, because Russia is doing so by choice, whereas Ukraine is doing so for survival. Context and motives matter.

people are allowed to criticize that state action.

I would agree that the citizens are allowed to do so. However, even those directly impacted, as per the article, are reluctant to do so not for fear of retribution, but because they understand there's a very delicate balance with regards to morale and such. Given that, any interference by us foreigners us likely to be unwelcome and unconstructive.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 5 days ago

The US-backed post-coup Ukrainian government could have not let it get to this point by not murdering Ukrainians in the East for nearly a decade, and letting nazis into every nook and cranny of the government and military.

"Just give up the east to the Nazi Ukrainian government and we promise they won't continue shelling them and killing people indiscriminately."

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And yet it uses the neologism "busification" that you can for sure see plastered on pro-Russia communities.

Exactly the sort of emotionally evocative word game that is, if not coined by conservative propagandists, then eagerly exploited. For example when those feel-don't-think phrases appear in the BBC.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Did you even bother to read? It's literally in quotes because it was used by Ukranians themselves in this article.

Military analyst Ivan Stupak agrees.

"We started to suffer a lack of manpower on the battlefield, constant losses," he recalls. "Ukraine's high command had to refill these losses so they started busification."

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

if not coined by conservative propagandists, then eagerly exploited.

[–] Trioxin@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Funny how it only "turned violent" when the victims struck back. But when 5 guys show up to grab someone and stuff them in a van, that somehow isn't violence...