zedcell

joined 3 years ago
[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

It's bad to fight back against women soldiers, cops and security guards. With this one neat trick I will make all war and violence illegal and wrong.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I think this is a rosy view of what revolution looks like. Armed police won't simply all disarm on the eve of their pay drying up. There are committed fascists amongst their ranks that will fight back pay or no pay at the prospect of a proletarian revolution. To think we have no ideologically committed foes that might operate in opposition to their immediate material interests is to fall to mechanistic materialism.

The Chinese civil war was 30-40 years long with ebbs and flows in the strength of the communist aligned movement and the nationalist movement. Nothing just stopped because the red army took control of a given province.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How do you end the system of property without violence? Do you think the landlord will just give up their property? Is there any historical precedent for that?

Violence is necessary to gain and then maintain control of a proletarian state until the system of property is undone. Landlords that fight back will be subjected to violence, more often than not in retaliation by the directly affected members of the proletariat. The Soviets and the communist party of the USSR would often have to intervene in outbursts of revolutionary violence from the masses, ensuring it didn't go too far and directing it where it had the most impact. The terror following the Russian revolution was directly in response to the violence meted out against communists by the Tsarist forces, hanging landlords and the bourgeoisie responsible in the streets to make examples of them for killing communists.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Marx didn't live when huge numbers of workers in the imperial core were invested in the market either actively with their excess savings or passively in their pension. You cannot "appeal to Marx" for something that did not exist within his time. What did exist within his time were discussions between him and Engels about the frustrating lack of revolutionary activity within certain strata of the English working class, which clearly does have parallels to today's situation. Identifying that strata (I.e. the labour aristocracy) is an important task for contemporary Marxists.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I suppose Palestinians in the UK should also have the right to have the star of David removed from all public spaces due to its use on Israel's flag and the fact they're being genocided by Israel, if October 7th can now perpetually be used to censor everything related to Palestine and Palestinian culture.

Lawyers for Israel need to be stricken off and kicked out of the country the fucking lawfare abusing trolls.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago

De-commodified housing can just as easily be privatised, see the UK.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Super fetch", how's that boot taste? Maybe it's a burnout prone job because they know 75% of what they do is acting as the bully boys of capital and the state, and they're full to the brim of racists and misogynists who don't make very good co-workers.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 day ago

Cuba is a "tankie" state and the most principled groups in support of it against the genocidal American blockade are "tankies". You are advancing US imperialism by chatting nonsense about so-called tankies, doing the hard work of the red scare for your supposed enemies.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake “public opinion” for the benefit of the bourgeoisie."

-- Lenin, 1921 https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1921/aug/05.htm

Still as true today as when he wrote it.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 3 days ago

In a socialist system you can account for the worker exploitation and attempt to fix it. Under global capitalism any price increase enforced at the imperial core end just means more profit for the capitalists. It does not mean that wages have increased in the exploited parts of the chain to account for the cost.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My understanding of what off-grid means is different to yours, and has a lot of other baggage like living in the woods in a homestead without a job.

Apologies for not making that clear. I agree that giving the capitalist class fewer opportunities to fuck you over if you become a thorn in their side is good.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Living off grid also makes you utterly powerless to change anything, unlike the proletariat.

 

Want to read more than just the wiki and thought people may have good recommendations 😊

view more: next ›