this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
116 points (96.8% liked)

World News

57329 readers
1224 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How is this different than the tariffs that were struck down by the courts, resulting in a big "refund" that made for a massive payday for companies while not refunding a single cent to the consumer that had to burden the cost through increased prices?

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The difference is a rapist doesn’t take no for an answer.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They already succeeded in using the tariffs to steal billions of dollars from the people for their cronies. What possible reason could they have to stop now, instead of repeating the theft and stealing billions more?

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

He’s using a different law to do it this time, section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930. This section hasn’t been used since shortly after the law passed. It’s a different law, so it’s not covered by the previous ruling.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Another reason to vote out Republicans in the US Senate and House. R Senators are the enablers that make terrible decisions like these that hurt American taxpayers happen. If they would even publicly speak out against the Donvict that they would vote to have Trumpepstein removed, then they could then justly say it's just the donOLD's fault and make a case to hold them blameless. But since they don't, these disgusting decisions are stains on THEIR records. It's their Constitutional responsibility to check the Executive when he goes out of line. Punish them in November and vote Blue!

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 14 points 1 week ago

It may hurt the citizens but its very lucrative for companies and share holders: Increase prices due to tariffs -> tariffs get struck down -> get refund from the government without giving it back to customers. It's a good time to be rich in the US.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Lmfao you big orange monkey. You're so fucking stupid.

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 13 points 1 week ago

Does that cover imported wildfire smoke?

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Deep cut bringing back the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act. Here comes the Greater Depression.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This completely fucks US auto manufacture. Also aluminum imports.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago
[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

"Trump imposing an extra 50% surcharge on Americans for products coming from Canada"

Fifty.