this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
30 points (100.0% liked)

Offbeat

1898 readers
2 users here now

Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!

Community Rules

Similar Communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As DeFranco says, it couldn't POSSIBLY be the high cost of living and all the other problems ...

Watch the full Daily DeFranco Show: https://www.youtube.com/@PhilipDeFranco?sub_confirmation=1Get More News Clips: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpLB7kBu9...

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] misk@piefed.social 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Social isolation amplified by antisocial media is definitely a contributing factor in declining birthrates. If the cost of living was the only/primary reason you’d have more childless couples but people don’t pair up into couples in the first place. Good on China for not succumbing to at least some aspects of this madness.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

people don’t pair up into couples in the first place.

Misogynistic culture is a contributing factor, combined with more awareness by women of their rights and higher expectations.

[–] misk@piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is way more complex to attribute blame to people of specific gender here.

Statistically speaking, at least in my country, women are now more likely to get a degree and move to a big city for work. In the big picture it isn’t because of some affirmative action (there’s some of that but it’s blown out of proportion) but simply because women are more likely to be socialised as diligent, agreeable and therefore more compatible with education and more employable in modern white collar jobs. Men are socialised to be somewhat unruly and aggressive (especially those from rural areas) so they stay behind to look after family farms and other businesses which often aren’t very profitable. This combined with little to no contact with women leads to them looking for something to blame for how their life turned out to be, usually ending with misogyny adjacent political ideology.

Current situation is similar to what suffragettes faced back in the day - they had to convince men but also swathes of women that they deserved equal rights. This toxic masculinity isn’t just harmful for women, it costs men a lot too - shorter lifespans, higher incarceration rates, higher suicide rates etc. We’d all be better off with some other masculinity model but it’s so ingrained into capitalism that both reinforce each other.

I wouldn’t absolve women of blame either. Same as every living person regardless of gender, they tend to look for a mate of similar social standing and are unlikely to compromise because there’s little reason to do so. This has strong classist undertones because that’s what it is. Men can compromise on it but for all the wrong reasons so I’m not saying that anything should be reversed here, rather we should rethink how all of this should work for the benefit of everyone. We emancipated women not because someone thought all humans or equal but because capitalism needed more workers and that’s probably where all of this went wrong.

This is way more complex to attribute blame to people of specific gender here.

Oh definitely, I'm just stating one of the factors. Anybody who thinks they can fully account for a huge social issue like this with a single simple reason is a politician.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I guess their trying but I dont think that's the source of heir issue tbh

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Smart move. Clankers should not be allowed to wear camo.