this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
123 points (96.9% liked)

World News

57191 readers
2227 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

WTF!?!? The USA attacked Iraq and Iran screaming about nukes and now they to give the lunatic Wahhabis nuclear weapons...WTF!?!?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 minutes ago

The 21st century will be the century of nuclear proliferation.

[–] Superorbit@lemmy.ca 1 points 42 minutes ago

....pardon?

[–] rimu@piefed.social 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

New stupidity tier unlocked

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

Setting up the ball for the next administration's war.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Elect conservatives (regressives), get a more expensive and less safe world. Simple as that.

[–] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

This is the dumbest shit. Like the guardian article says, you don't need to enrich uranium to make nuclear power. Canada has been doing it for decades using the CANDU system.

There are exactly two reasons to enrich uranium:

  1. providing starting material for the more efficient U-238 -> Pu reactors, which burn 100% of the uranium instead of less than 1%, or thorium reactors. Both of these require much more pure fuel, just to get going. Probably not this one, because this requires very sophisticated technology that pretty much only France has ever managed to do at scale with Phénix.

  2. bombs

[–] Nautalax@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

There are advantages that CANDU had for Canada that aren’t as great for most other countries in the world. The main benefits are that you don’t need to enrich which is industrially demanding (enrichment requires you develop and maintain those capabilities or rely on another party that does) and that you can do online refueling. That was attractive for Canada because they had a relatively underdeveloped industry so doing all the heavy upfront costs of establishing it for enriching while not being able to make fuel for many plants was a tall and seriously expensive order while buying enriched fuel kind of puts you at the whim of someone else. Plus didn’t need to make a large pressure vessel which would have been difficult for Canada back then. And back in the day light water reactor capacity factors were hot garbage with outages all the time (and not quick outages either but long sustained ones) so refueling while still generating was awesome though eventually you do need a very extended retubing outage after a few decades. It also benefited Canada because Canada has both a massive amount of uranium ore and the largest water resources of any country. So they have ample inputs for the relatively simple processing of uranium into unenriched fuel and water to produce heavy water.

These are not as much the case for Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia doesn’t really have a problem with being somewhat dependent on foreign suppliers and throwing around money (otherwise the deal wouldn’t be happening), they will apparently be testing over the next two years if they consider it a better deal to develop indigenous enrichment through this or not bother and just rely on the US doing it in their country. Generally though they are looking to spend money to carve out non-hydrocarbon areas of the economy to diversify out to so if they can do indigenous uranium mining and enrichment and sell that to others that would be considered a win. In any case, American companies will provide substantial assistance on setting this up since it’s not being developed independently. Light water capacity factors really tightened up and are now in like the 90%s rather than 60-70% so online refueling isn’t quite as attractive as it once was. And, unlike Canada, they don’t have tons of water resources and have to do a lot of expensive processing of seawater to even get water for drinking; you have to process an enormous quantity of water to get heavy water, particularly in the purity needed for reactor water grade.

Consider that even Canada is building a light water reactor rather than CANDU for the latest expansion at Darlington, a site which is otherwise all CANDU and had the latest actually built CANDU reactors in the country. Evidently they felt the economics worked out better that way or the people who have been doing CANDU for the longest would not be swapping horses like that.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Give the nutcases who attacked us on 9/11 nuclear weapons. Brilliant!

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

But Israel already has nuclear weapons.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

The same Saudi that helped plan 9/11? Good call, they seem like a strong ally.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Planned and funded with Saudi nationals

[–] tekato@lemmy.world -3 points 7 hours ago

Either the US does it and can at least keep an eye on the program, or another country helps them and it’s the same situation just worse.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Next foreign terrorist attack on the U.S. will involve nuclear material and then Americans will act all surprised when it happens.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not a fan of Saudi Arabia, but... what?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Saudi Arabia nationals were responsible for 9/11

So naturally the USA went off and attacked Iraq and Afghanistan in revenge

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

True, but why would that give hypothetical future 9/11-ists to Saudi Arabian uranium? The Saudi government, being a willing and committed US vassal, had almost certainly has no intention of letting anything like that happen.

[–] brandon@piefed.social 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

One real issue is that the Saudi government is really just a bunch of minor princes and royal family members in a trenchcoat.

So yes, it may be the case that the King and senior officials don't want to enable the proliferation of nuclear materials, but that doesn't mean the Saudi government isn't a leaky seive.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The Saudi gov was already a "willing and committed US vassal" when 9/11 took place and that obviously didn't stop it from happening

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but it didn't happen using Saudi government anything. My point is: Why the assumption that hypothetical future terrorists would be able to get access to Saudi Arabian nuclear material?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because it will now be available to them... you seem to be under the impression that the SA gov will have 100% control of everything as if illegal material does not constantly find its way into black markets

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io -1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, if it was that easy it'd have already happened somewhere.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago

I'm sure that is a risk you are willing to take with your family on the line

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago

What could go wrong?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Just a bunch of terrorists etching weapon of mass destruction deals. Nothing could possibli go wrong.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 12 hours ago

But Iran can't have a nuclear program because they'll make nuclear weapons.

[–] Nautalax@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Previously the US was demanding that Saudi Arabia normalize relations with Israel before it would support this. Since that’s no longer being held over their head, this could be considered as a hit to Israel and as a win for the Saudi-Turkey-Qatar-Egypt block.

[–] skvlp@lemmy.wtf 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why? Build solar farms on a small fraction of the land and the population has energy.

Is this some crazy logic reaction to cocking it up in Iran?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

My guess is because they saw what happened to Iran who do not have a nuclear weapon. They saw what happened to them when they don't have a nuclear weapon. And they saw how the US moved defensive assets to protect Israel while their neighbours turned into missile targets.

[–] skvlp@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 hours ago

Ok, I can see that logic from SA. But what is Trump (or rather the adults I the room around him…) thinking here?

Pulling out of the enrichment agreement, attacking Irans nuclear facilities, going to war with Iran - all with at least some pretence about keeping them from getting nukes.

And then he turns around and grants enrichment (and possibly a weapons program?) to Saudi Arabia…!?

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago