It's so strange to me that they can't just shrink the picture down to show everything, like π« noooooo we have to use the whole screen!!!
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2026
324 points (93.8% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
41117 readers
3692 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It's partly because people would complain the other way if they only used half the cinema screen to display the full IMAX image. I'm not gonna do the maths, but I think Odyssey being 1.43:1 ratio would leave about half the screen blanked out on the sides.
But mostly because it's the main selling point of IMAX films is there's more image than a standard ratio. That more is supposed to be mostly in your peripheral vision rather than where you're focused, directors aren't really putting anything important in these extremities of the image.
So to pillarbox that image would just dramatically shrink the bit of the screen the viewer should be focusing on, on an already smaller screen.
main selling point of IMAX films is there's *more* image than a standard ratio.
This helped me get it, I never considered imax because of the price so I never thought about what it even meant
Image max / maximum image
I'm not gonna do the maths
Let me help you out there, since I need something to help me procrastinate anyways lol
being 1.43:1 ratio would leave about half the screen blanked out on the sides.
I was curious to find out what this came out to as well. Turns out though, on a 16:9 screen, scaling a full 1.43:1 frame to fit only results in side bars that each take up less than 10% of the image, (less than what I was suspecting to be honest).
While a ~20% size reduction isn't ideal, so is watching a movie that was composed for a different aspect ratio. IMHO, people should have the choice to watch in whatever way best appeals to their needs. We used to do this on DVDs where you could opt for either the widescreen or fullscreen version of the movie, so there's definitely precedent for it.
Unfortunately, the option for the 1.43 version of many of these movies can't be found outside of their IMAX run in theaters. (At least not officially...)
FWIW, 16:9 is mostly used for wide-screen TV content (about 1.85:1), the effect is more pronounced because cinema screens are typically 2.39:1 with most content being that ratio
That's why you still get letterboxes watching films on TV a lot of the time, despite us all having widescreens now
We lose 20% on each side
1.43*2.39^-1=0.60
So when they release Odyssey for home viewing on streaming or however it gets released, do they pillar box it? Or they pan and scan edit it?
Home releases will almost certainly get the non-IMAX, 2.39:1 crop they've already cut for standard cinemas, and it'll get the standard cinema letterboxing you see for other theatrical releases if you watch on a 16:9 TV.
Pan and scan has thankfully died off as a practice
I guess I should have said crop rather than pan and scan. But I assume itβs still not a βfixedβ crop in that they might change the crop area based on scene or shot?
I guess it's likely they're doing some amount of that, yeah. However I believe the way directors typically approach IMAX is to still centre the shot the way you would without the extra vertical frame, so a centred crop would usually be the best option.
I'd find it hard to believe that they never take the opportunity to shift things a bit if it would make it better anyway
Makes sense, 16:9 was chosen by TV manufactures because it sat nicely with most common aspect ratios (ranging from 3:4 to 1:2.5)
Ugh. The selling point of standard theaters used to be the better aspect ratio
People seemed to like Obsession a lot and it was 1.5:1, it made nearly $500m
Just show the IMAX version and let the extra fall off the screen and shine on the audience and sell tickets for dudes to sit inside her boobs.
"Gaze in awe upon the epic prow of Ms. Christina Hendricks" wrote some who is not me.
My first thought when reading this cover was, 'Christina Hendricks would be the only person I would let try to touch my prostate with an egg beater.'
My second thought was, 'oh this isn't a real magazine cover'. It took me longer than it should to realize it. π
SEX JESUS NAKED SEX TOUGH PLUS SEX
Hmmmmm... Sure am glad I don't like this bullshit
They say overanalyzing but I say underanalized!
I may be face-blind but I recognised her.
The chin dimple is unmistakable.
...she has a chin? I never noticed...
Totally stunning in "Mad Men"..
Just as Nolan intended
Kinda important to always include floatation devices
"Leave me at the nearest port, never look upon me again. I'll make my way with the strength that you've taught me, only let me have my wedding night."
I loved that bitch.
Just as Nolan intended douche sounds