this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
66 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

1252 readers
147 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

Monitor every stock trade Congress and the White House makes

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In any case, the Post has been pulling out all the stops when it comes to the wealth tax. They’ve run no less than 10 opinion pieces since March arguing against state and federal taxes on wealth and unrealized income—the “paper” gains that constitute the vast majority of the income of the richest Americans. The fact that the IRS can’t touch that income is how Bezos, according to ProPublica, managed to pay a true income tax rate of less than 1 percent from 2014 to 2018.

Here’s the Post’s recent lineup:

  • March 2: “Bernie Sanders’s 2028 litmus test would strangle America’s golden goose” (Editorial board)
  • March 8: “The myth of the billionaire wealth tax” (Megan McCardle)
  • April 17: “This tax would rain a wealth of unintended consequences” (George Will)
  • June 5: “The ‘buy, borrow, die’ myth” (Editorial board)
  • June 27: “Gavin Newsom’s wealth tax two-step” (Editorial board)
  • July 3: “Lower inequality does not guarantee better democracy” (Editorial board)
  • July 16: “Socialists think wealth is stolen. They’re wrong.” (Marian L. Tupy, Cato Institute)
  • July 21: “‘It should be laughed out of the room’: Four writers on midterm ballot measures” (Megan McCardle, again)
  • July 19: “Medicare-for-all means taxes-for-all” (Editorial board)
  • July 23: “I’m from Nebraska. Here’s what wealth-tax advocates don’t realize.” (Ben Nelson, former US senator; senior adviser for Saving America’s Family Enterprises)
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. The answer is yes.

No oligarch wants democracy, because democracy would mean they only get 1 vote, just like everyone else.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Some of us are just more equal than others.

Clearly yes

Well, duh. Bezos owns it.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

July 3: “Lower inequality does not guarantee better democracy” (Editorial board)

So fucking evil.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

We didn't realize it was a mission statement