1434
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People will point out that US health does get a decent chunk of money, though they'll leave out that it goes to others (insurance profit) so the care part doesn't actually get that value. Like how US spends more just in tax per-capita than many countries with universal care spend total, but we get significantly less for it.

So really it should mirror the war table but with a fat CEO or two smoking a cigar, with the emaciated doctor excluded from the table.

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 90 points 1 year ago

Hey, now. Sciences gets a little bit on their dish when it makes something for war.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It's a sausage, shaped like an A-bomb

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Science is in the kitchen, redoing the duck confit for the third fucking time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uis@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Context: this is translated image from soviet magazine issued in 1953, right after Stalin's death.

Also Sciences table is Libraries table.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Valid criticism, even though Soviet Union fell victim to the very same thing later on

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

This just proves we are not getting smarter as time goes on.

[-] tetraodon@feddit.it 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No really we are.

The Wermacht absorbed 25% of Germany's GDP in 1944. Today it doesn't reach 1.4%. Even Russia is spending "only" 6% of its GDP on its army, and the US 3%.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Can you fucking imagine the US spending 25% of its gdp on the military? Jesus fuck we could build a death star

[-] TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

I am sure that is currently in planning

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Somehow, MacArthur returned...

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

There was once a Congressional Petition that got enough signatures to be read aloud in the US House of Representatives but it got rejected on the floor.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

Well, Germany was in an all-out war that was fought partially on their soil. It was very obvious to the Nazi leadership that there was a very real risk of losing that war.

That's not comparable at all to the wars the USA or Russia have fought in this century. Even in WW2 there was never any serious risk of anyone invading the USA.

The last time the USA has had a war on their territory that actually threatened the existance of the USA was, I guess, the civil war.

If it was about the existance of the USA, they'd also be spending a little more on the war effort.

(Just to make sure that nobody misunderstands me: Nazis are scum and as an Austrian I am really happy they lost the war. I was just talking about defence spending strategy.)

[-] tetraodon@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fair objection, but my point still stands.

Let's check US post-WWII military spending and you notice a definite trend down as a % of the GDP: https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/military-spending-defense-budget

Same in the UK, France, Germany, Italy, and most big spenders. Now I'm not going to analyze every single country, and I'm sure you can find exceptions, but my bet is that at least in Western democracies the trend is down.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Because there hasn't been any credible threat for decades.

But now that Russia is back as an evil "superpower", defence spending is sharply rising in Europe.

And so far there is no real indication that Russia will ever take the Ukraine let alone attack the EU/NATO. If Russia or China were to directly attack NATO, you'd see defense spending going up pretty sharply.

But even now, nobody believes that Russia or China will dare to attack NATO in the near future. It probably will be limited to a proxy war (proxy for the NATO side) in the Ukraine and/or Taiwan.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

That's a good distinction. Even most anti-war people would probably do everything in their power to repel an existential threat on their soil, to say nothing of the cost.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TyrionsNose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And Healthcare in the USA is between 18-20%.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Metal Gear solid is what really opened my eyes to a global economy being supported by war. I know war and conflict is to an extent, part of being human. But it's been monetized and it's become too big to fail.

[-] crackajack@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

The military industrial complex has become too big to fail, because it is jobs provider for many places that don't have much resources. It's not a coincidence that many defense contractors are headquartered in peripheral regions like the American South West desert and Scotland. These places don't have much to offer in terms of resources so they became dependent on the industry. Either that, or they become tax haven like other small entities like Ireland, Luxembourg and Seychelles.

I'm not trying to justify the existence of MICs by the way, I'm explaining why the industry became intertwined. Although, I believe there is just war if a country is either provoked or to stop atrocities, such as the NATO intervention in Yugslav wars and supporting Ukraine against the Russian invasion.

[-] superguy@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the writing in that game was too on point.

They did a great job of blending the surreal nature of MGS with the real world and current events.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 21 points 1 year ago

Clearly 830Bn budget for Military every single year is too goddamn much, but at the same time I'm all for supporting NATO and opposing Russia. I think slowly reducing the military budget of the USA would be good, but keeping active operations overseas alive. As much as I realize the USA has caused more harm than good, I also realize suddenly ending our operations can be just as harmful, such as when the Trump Admin released 5k Taliban Fighters and withdrew from Afghanistan, to which the Biden Administration followed through with.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] benjihm@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago
[-] sagrotan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And there are no "sides", every one loses, even and especially the ones who think they win money, power or land will lose in the end. When will they finally get it that we all live on this insignificant pebble in dark cold space and we have to grow up instead of fighting like spoiled toddlers in a sandbox.

[-] Cloral@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

This cartoon is from 70 years ago. 80 years ago was 1943 which was in the middle of World War 2. At that point, war getting a sizable chunk of the GDP was perhaps more understandable. So the caption on the cartoon actually undersells it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Cringe2793@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

That's because the people who are in charge haven't changed much. Sure, their names have changed, but they're largely the same type of person who do the same types of things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Buffalobuffalo@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

This is longer true. Social security, Medicare, and medicaid are all less than 80 years old and make up more of the federal budget than defense spending.

These are the top 5 budget item according to the us treasury for 2022. Social security 23% Heath 15% National defense 13% Medicare 13% Income security 13%

“Veterans benefits and services” is another category which I guess could be considered war spending or healthcare.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Social security is paying back what people have put into it, nobody alive today is collecting from it without having paid in to it their entire working life. It seems misleading to call this an expenditure in the sense that military spending is.

There is also a distinct difference between healthcare spending and healthcare being received. The US spends a lot on “healthcare” that is actually insane insurance profiteering or useless administrative costs. There’s a reason the US has the highest expenditure per person in the world, but the worst health outcomes among any industrialized nation (and worse than some developing nations if you’re a minority).

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

Preach! "Medicare-For-All", Single-Payer, whatever you want to call it, we need universal healthcare! It's literally better and cheaper.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

History doesn't repeat, it plagiarizes.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hoerbinator@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Well kinda depends on the country. Switzerland spends 2 bilion for the military but 8 bilion for education and 35 bilion for health care. I am sure, the balance looks pretty similar or even more extrem in the northic european country

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every time there's a war somewhere, i get reminded that "humanize" are a lot like chimps. They are so clever, nice to each other, only until things goes to sh*t unexpectedly. That's when hell explodes, everything is "allowed" Faces get ripped off, fingers bitten off ect.

I still don't get why humans need wars are each period of peace. As if having too much good things got boring .

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

That's just game theory.

[-] Smk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

What's the point of science or healthcare if your neighbors comes in and kill you all ?

Well, time to go into IT. There will always be jobs there.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
1434 points (97.8% liked)

Political Memes

5621 readers
2099 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS