229

Muslim and Arab Americans say their support was critical to Biden’s winning Michigan in 2020. Some warn they won’t back him again over his blanket support for Israel.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 138 points 1 year ago

Wonder what they think Trump would have done differently.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 85 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Trump is advocating turning Gaza into a parking lot.

And it's not like Democrats have exactly been shy of their general support of Israel, if you've paid any attention at all. They just also happen to acknowledge that Palestinians are people, unlike most Republicans.

[-] danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 42 points 1 year ago

It's possible to be angry at both Republicans and Democrats.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 80 points 1 year ago

But you still must vote for the one likely to do you the least harm if you don't want to get fucked. White Biden sucks he's objectively better than Trump for Muslim Americans. Trump was talking about deporting and blocking them from entering.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

In a First Past the Post voting system, refusing to vote, or voting 3rd party, is numerically the same as an extra vote for the candidate you hate the most. It's just one more vote closer to victory that your opposition gets.

Neither party is great, there's plenty to dislike about both, but it's patently obvious that one is far more harmful than the other.

[-] stu@lemmy.pit.ninja 17 points 1 year ago

Well it's not really numerically the same as voting for the candidate you hate the most, it's numerically the same as not voting. And to be honest, it really only matters if you're in a potential swing state. And I'm saying this as someone who still votes despite having lived in a deep red state where my presidential vote always doesn't matter (but I go anyway because down ballot votes do matter and I might as well vote the whole ballot).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)

So instead of diminished aid for Palestine, you’d rather… checks notes… travel bans for all middle eastern people trying to go to the US, except for people from a handful of governments who are actively giving Trump money?

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

Don't forget Trump's son-in-law's middle east foreign policy plan for Israel that Palestinian supporting groups rejected and weren't consulted with further. Israel was to be allowed to annex existing settled positions, and no further expansion from either side. Israeli settlers haven't adhered to this "peace plan" anyway.

Any Americans staying home at elections, this type of foreign policy is what they tacitly support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure don't vote Biden. Just vote for the fascist Republicans that previously banned people from muslim countries. That will work, right gaiz? Plus any Republican president won't ever send Gaza aid. Biden is sending aid.

https://www.npr.org/2023/10/18/1206897197/biden-makes-deal-on-aid-delivery-to-gaza

[-] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Does anybody else think that this "One strike and you're dead to me, regardless of how complex the issue is" thing is getting a little out of hand? The only winning move here is not to play, but then he would be attacked from both sides for appearing apathetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 68 points 1 year ago

Single issue voters are myopic

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Eh. I’d argue that if your single issue is climate change, you’re rather sharp sighted. But I take your point in general.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] S_204@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Islam and far right Christianity have a lot in common. Wouldn't surprise me that the Muslim community would side with the party that wants to limit women's rights and LGBTQ rights.

[-] Hereforpron2@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Honestly it's shocking how most religions veer right in the most extreme groups. Ultra orthodox anything tends to lead to traditional but extreme sexism, cultishness, and xenophobia, or in other words, the GOP.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not shocking at all. If your religion encourages open mindedness, people will open their minds. This gives them the opportunity to leave whenever they want.

But a religion that exerts control over its members tends to trap people into it, therefore growing over time. So we see that successful religions tend towards extremism, because they are more “fit”, in a Darwinist sense.

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not shocking. The right, conservatism, can be explained by asking what it is they want to conserve. What do conservatives want to conserve?

The answer is traditional societal norms, hierarchies and power structures. From here it isnt a big jump to understand why religions and conservatism often go hand in hand.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

So, like, are they going to vote for the guy that literally has "banning Muslims" as a platform?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Random_German_Name@feddit.de 52 points 1 year ago

Ok, but then don‘t cry when Trump gets reelected

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 51 points 1 year ago

Welp…good lucky with that other guy, whomever that might be.

[-] seejur@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

My feeling is that this "betrayed" part of Muslim is the socially conservative one that voted left because the right was racists and pro Israel. But if the left is pro Israel as well, then they might as well vote right to get conservative (pro life, misogynistic) policies forward

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 17 points 1 year ago

TBH, the bizarre cognitive dissonance in all these religious types (pick one) bypasses all rational thought processes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

“I am willing to vote for a much worse actual fascist monster who will 100% use his presidency to destroy democracy and those that tried to hold him accountable, all because Biden… stood with an ally during a horrendous terrorist attack even though because of Biden Israel has slowed its roll and allowed aid in”

The full brainless take from that moron. What an emotionally stunted bullshit opinion

[-] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Or they could just not vote at all like most Americans

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

In a two party system, abstention is a vote for the person you hate most.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

So their option would be...what?

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A man giving up his life for the USA is not enough to stop Trump from berating that soldier's surviving family publicly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khizr_and_Ghazala_Khan

If Arab and Muslim want to choose that over Biden because of Palestine well then I'll not contribute ever again to a rebuilding of the mosque in my community.

Consider my face eaten, leopards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 33 points 1 year ago

If I have to choose between eating a shit sandwich and a shit sandwich with broken glass, I'm gonna choose the one without the broken glass every time. So many people seem to think that eating the one with broken glass, or letting someone else choose, is somehow taking a stand against shit sandwiches.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

religion makes people do the dumbest shit

[-] ricdeh@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

So who are they going to vote for then? I cannot believe that they would imagine Trump to be more sympathetic to their cause, if anything, Israel would receive even stronger backing were he the President

[-] hh93@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Didn't he basically put a fire to the whole conflict by moving the embassy to Jerusalem?

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

They obvioualy haven't heard what Trump and the right said about Hamas then, or they wouldnt be thinking that way.

This is a best case scenario.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, vote for a republican because that’s definitely not going to fuck you. And let’s fucking be real, all you pedants: a vote other than Biden is a vote for the republican traitor filth.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago

because of biden we got the ground invasion put off and humanitarian aid flowing into gaza...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Mylemmy@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

😂 lol so they want trump.... Who wants to wipe out all Muslims.

[-] sagrotan@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

That makes no sense whatsoever to me. And I'm not alone, that I know for sure. I mean the whole ordeal: religion, war, hate, the economic construct of "nations" - I don't get it anymore. Actually never had.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Muslims make up less than 1% of the U.S. population, which is much less than the margin of any presidential election in my lifetime, so I doubt Biden is losing too much sleep over this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Seems kinda weak, just stating who you don't support. And to be a single issue voter is dangerous.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
229 points (83.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2847 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS