515
sobs quietly (s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by Masimatutu@mander.xyz to c/politicalhumor@lemmy.ml

late edit: DISCLAIMER: The pictured map is not actually a representation of the territories before colonisation. It's a hypothetical map of what countries there might have been had the continent not been colonised, thus all the names and borders are fictional and have never existed.

For good actual maps, check out native-land.ca.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 126 points 9 months ago

This map has some really weird boundaries that totally don't match reality. Here's a more accurate map: https://native-land.ca/

[-] shadowspirit@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

That is a well designed map. Kudos to the creator.

[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

It even has a filter for language distribution over geography!

That makes me so happy and sad at the same time.

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago

Yeah the map is shit but I appreciate someone pointing this out right now while there is a peak in awareness of the struggle of colonized people.

It's unfortunate that people only start talking about it when something like what is happening in Palestine breaks news for being so especially horrifying.

The fact is that this shit is going on right in our own back yard and has been for centuries and we should absolutely have solidarity with Palestine and their fight against the genocidal Zionist entity but we must also recognize that we have an important responsibility to fight against the bigger genocidal settler colonial entity that enables them and that is the US.

[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

Bookmarked, this is amazing

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Also, the Anasazi died out centuries before Europeans arrived.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Bananigans@lemmy.ml 80 points 9 months ago

Unless I'm remembering middle school wrong, the map seems shy a few hundred tribes.

[-] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 41 points 9 months ago

I also don't recall there being lines

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 14 points 9 months ago

If you see the lines as approximations, I'm fine with it. There were no borders in the sense that nation states have them today of cause.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

i mean a trivial solution to this is to just use colours with a soft gradient at the edges, you have a rough outline but it's clear that there is no hard border

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

And many more tribes and communities were outright murdered by colonizers before they could even be documented. There are plenty of tribes that are just lost to time or we know nearly nothing about because they have no surviving members.

Indigenous peoples also don't necessarily view tribes, nations, etc as rigid categories where you're either one or the other, no exceptions. That in fact is the European view where you can only be part of one empire and where every empire seeks to capture as much land and resources for themselves as possible. You'll notice that the native-land.ca map has tons of overlapping territories.

[-] seSvxR3ull7LHaEZFIjM@feddit.de 44 points 9 months ago

I think this map tries to apply European notions of borders and nation states where they don't really apply.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 31 points 9 months ago

It's also wildly inaccurate as it's a fictional map of an uncolonized America in 2015

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Are there any other white North Americans here that grew up in mild reverence of your alleged mixed Native American heritage, and then find out later (through DNA tests or what have you) that there isn't even the slightest trace of native in your bloodline, and all of your relatives (who have Cherokee art in their house and shit) have all been terribly misled by some weird family rumor for decades?

Like, I suppose the silver lining here is that it's probably a good thing to have more white people out there who respect and are sympathetic toward the plight of native genocide, but holy fuck, boys.. It doesn't seem as though anyone in the family has an explanation for it. Every last person just grew up accepting that our Grandmother/Great Grandmother/Family Matriarch was half Cherokee.

It's my understanding that this is a common thing in Appalachia, and while my family is from the Great Lakes, my Great Grandparents fled Kentucky during or shortly after the Harlan County strikes, so I imagine the rumor began all the way back then. Though this rumor only gets weirder for those familiar with the miner strikers when you note my (confirmed) descendency from one of the primary villains of that period, who was most certainly not of Cherokee blood. But who am I to say whether or not he engaged in coitus and/or matrimony with someone believed to have been.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 9 points 9 months ago

It's conceivable that someone could have been accepted into a tribe and grew up believing themselves to be Native American, but the whole confirmed-descent-from-primary-villain thing really blows that hypothesis out of the water.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

My family (Appalachia) swears this one or that one was full Cherokee. My dna shows mostly what you’d expect. English, Irish, and Scottish. I also have 1% Nigerian dna. I figure that’s probably it. Someone was making an excuse for being a bit dark. That doesn’t explain how everyone I know is white as snow and claiming native ancestry though.

My wife shows 3% native ancestry, so her people didn’t make it up.

A lot of dna was lost to genocide though, so some can’t be tested for.

[-] s_s@lemmy.one 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

My wife's family is Appalachian (WV) and what I've distilled is that anyone who could tan at all (ie not completely ghostly Scotch-Irish) was told "well that must be indian blood in you!"

And then later they tell their grandkids "Your uncle roy was part-cherokee!"

Then those kids grow up and tell their kids, "Your great uncle Roy's grandma was Tenskwatawa's sister!"

It's all just a bad game of telephone with foggy memories and no real fact-checking.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rothaine@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago
[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

Not to say she gets to claim tribal membership, but her DNA test corroborated her family story. I never understood why she got so much shit for that.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wait, it actually did? I thought the whole issue was that she "lied" about it to get special treatment in admissions for schooling.

So these asshats going on about "Pocahontas warren" aren't even correct? They're just mocking how DNA transfer happens over generations? That would absolutely be on brand, mock someone for your own ignorance...

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

Yes, though it didn’t “prove” ancestry to the high standards required for tribal membership, which requires linking one’s ancestry back through specific names using official genealogical records. She is estimated to be 1/32 Cherokee ancestry, exactly in line with her family stories, and the same as the current chief of one of the Cherokee nations. But, to be clear, we should also be respectful of the Cherokee nation’s political sovereignty in determining membership.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kholby@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Yes, everyone in my small town in north Georgia made this claim.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Hah, that's wild. My dad has an incredible amount of genealogy research (he's the kind that will go to city halls in bumfuck middle of nowhere) and the instance of Cherokee in our family traces back to late 1800s. I believe it would be my great, great, great grandmother. Her family were survivors of the 1830-1850 genocide (aka the trail of tears), and she was born a while after in Oaklahoma. Her information was recorded because she married a Christian man, under pressure from her parents according to letters found. My grandmother is a member of the tribe in Oaklahoma, for all the good that it does as she never actually did anything with them.

[-] zartcosgrove@beehaw.org 6 points 9 months ago

That is exactly what happened to me. I didn't find out until I took a 23 and me test. I didn't believe the results, took the Ancestry.com test, got the exact same results. Had some interesting conversations with family after that, but basically, no one is willing to accept it's been a lie the whole time.

[-] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So there's a lot to unpack here but I'll give it a try:

  1. You could have native ancestry even if it doesn't show up in a DNA test. Consider a person with ancestry A has a kid with someone of another ancestry, whose descendants do not reproduce with another person with ancestry A. Then that ancestry would logically show up in these percentages: 100 50 25 12.5 6.25 3.125 <2 <1... But this assumes that it divides evenly, which it does not. Even if it did though, in this example that ancestry might be undetectable after about 8 generations.
  2. There's a lot of "I have a native ancestor" narratives out there. Why? Claims to American legitimacy, alleviation of colonial guilt, that one guy in a feathered headdress cried about littering and I'm sad about it too, etc.
  3. It doesn't matter. Ancestry is pointless. Your DNA is just a listing of the traits your body was originally constructed on. If a native couple adopt a white kid and raise them on a reservation that child has had more of the native experience than a white passing person of native ancestry raised in Boston. Even more importantly though, none of it changes the fact that colonialism was a crime, we all should have empathy for its victims, and the way forward is by treating people with respect and dignity and trying to repair the damage while preventing it from happening again.
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] KaleDaddy@beehaw.org 29 points 9 months ago

This map is nonsense and implies rigid European borders. It ignored the hundreds of independent tribes on the continent. Comparing illegal immigration with colonizing is stupid too. Also the map implies native people never conquered each other or colonized others land which to be clear, is not justifying later European colonization, but we shouldn't play into the noble savage trope.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 8 points 9 months ago

Yes, colonizing is much, much worse than "illegal immigration," which is a term conceived by colonists.

[-] TonyToniToneOfficial@lemmy.ml 16 points 9 months ago

Choctaw nation would like a word

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

That was one of two that jumped out as absent for me. Seminole was the other.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 52fighters@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago

My wife is Ojibwe and her tribe illegally migrated several hundred miles west about one generation before Europeans arrived, taking land that belonged to other natives.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago

Haida Gwaii is the name of the island, not the nation. And the Salish are coastal. Totally wrong. :/

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Why do you have the Aztec Empire extended into the Chihuahua Desert? That's Chichimeca territory. Why are the Tarascans removed from the map?

[-] Pepperette@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

Why is Haida Gwaii covering half of BC when the island they're from isn't even on the map?

[-] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

They penciled in "Olmec Kingdom". That's like me going over to a map of Greece and writing Mycenae.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure about some of this, like Anasazi were not contemporaneous with the other tribes listed.

[-] lyam23@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Looks like a fictional alternative timeline map.

[-] geogle@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

If I'm not mistaken, the name too means "Ancient Enemies" in Navaho.

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I'm glad they colonizers brought some large bodies of fresh water with them at least.

[-] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago

For anyone interested in advancing this cause I can't recommend enough to look into Chunka Luta Network.

https://www.instagram.com/chunkalutanetwork/reel/Cy3nmU-uMMz/

The path to liberation lies in these decolonial struggles, the fight that indigenous people have been putting up against the US imperial project is inextricable from the fight to liberate the people of Palestine. The only way for any of us to be free, ALL of us must be free. That means that there is no fighting against Zionism without also fighting against the US settler colonial project that enables it.

Every small donation literally saves lives as temperatures are dropping fast and Pine Ridge reservation in South Dakota is one of the poorest places in the country. Average life expectancy among men is ~52, and for women ~54. We are securing gas money for collecting firewood, warm clothes and winter supplies, food, and eventually building new housing and a community center.

It is hard to get direct aid to people in Palestine right now but you can fight the genocidal settler colonial project in your back yard by helping us build dual power and save lives.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] kender242@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

https://youtu.be/S4gU2Tsv6hY

history civilis had a great breakdown of the politics and organization of the iroquois confederacy. Different ways to govern and balance power.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
515 points (90.3% liked)

Political Humor

3092 readers
5 users here now

Post politically charged comedy here, but be respectful!

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS