German and French youth did that, they won and nothing happened 🤷♂️
It is a pretty good argument in debates to be able to say that policticans directly violate the constitution.
I still think they should try. It starts a conversation.
What was the exact outcome of the cases?
Is it a situation where the carbon emitters just went to the next municipality or was the outcome legally meaningless?
If every jurisdiction had the same outcome would that make an effect?
In Germany the outcome was a new law, which gave sectors carbon budgets and made the ministries responsible for them have to come up with a plan, if they fail them. The issue is that the ministry for transport is failing them for a few years now and has just refused to come up with any plans on how to stay in the budget of the transport sector. There are some cases against it, but so far the courts refuse to actually force any real changes. The good part is the media has regular reports of the ministry for transport breaking the constitution, the bad part is that actually doing something about it is very clearly going to end up in a bigger shit storm for the ministry.
Damn. Thanks for the informative reply.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.