ArkimedesWasRight

joined 2 years ago
[–] ArkimedesWasRight@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably, of you throw enpugh cache at it. πŸ˜…

Seems it would be more appropriate to call them - The Trump Files.

Well no. If a country used to export a lot of goods and services to the US. The tariffs makes those goods and services less competitive in the US. Thus the exporting country will likely sell less goods and servise to the US.

And here it is Denmark that is the primary tatget. But Mr. President does not believe Denmark will yeld and give him what he desire. So he also goes after the heroes family and friends for extra pressure.

[–] ArkimedesWasRight@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Write an article about good UI. Post it on a page where it is snowing so it becomes incredibly annoying to read.

The irony is golden.

For one moment I thought it might mess wit AI bots. But no it probably does not.

[–] ArkimedesWasRight@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We do indeed think, and market devices using inch for screen size. Simply because it always been that way. People are used to it. Now, how many actually know that spec refers to the diagonal...

That is exactly what they are doing. Focusing on problems that actually matter TO THEM. The average person's problem is not their problem.

Every post I read in this format makes the same trivial mistake. It assumes that shorts decrease the amount of available shares.

No they don’t! They infact INCREASE the float.

When you calculate 44m - 55m there should be a + in-between, not a -.

It is so simple. If the company had only 3 shares and I borrow 1 and sell, now there are 4 shares owned and 1 share owed. Real float is still 3, apparent float is 4. Thus causing price suppression.

In theory I could borrow and sell the same share over and over. The real float is always 3, but the apartment float grows.

TLDR: shorts increase the apparent total number of shares in the float.