The first word you submitted in this comment chain is literally "pronouns" and the topic of conversation is your stated choice of "it/its" pronouns and implication that you use them when not engaging with individuals, like on this board.
Oh for sure. Actually doing this is really unfair to her, and shouldn't happen.
I also appreciate your reasoning for calling her Vivian. Well said.
Well, for starters, "college" uses a soft g sound.
Back pocket trick?
I'm not sure what EXACTLY you'd be looking for from a search feature as I'm mostly a light user myself, but there's a search option which will search the contents of all your notes. I can't tell you how robust it is, but it does have exclusion (desiredTerm -excludeTerm) search at least, and there's standard Find/Replace functionality once you're in the specific note.
numerous bear sightings led to a plea for people not to use 911 to report non-emergency bear sightings.
Not to make light of the situation, but I really must insist that these be re-categorized into "casual" and "competitive" bear sightings.
The claim in this article seems to me to be flawed. The core claim seems to be that the landlord cannot pass on the costs to the tenant because the market is at capacity. But what this really means is, the tax WILL be passed through to the tenants until maximum exploitation of the tenants (as a resource) has been reached. Which would include the UBI safety net as well, since the system demands (intentionally) maximum exploitation of this limited resource, no?
At this point, the landlord can continue to reduce their OWN share of the profits, sure. But the LVT will continue to increase over time, so eventually the landlord is priced out of the area, the building closes, and all tenants are evicted. MAYBE this particular landlord has enough capital to re-invest into the land that it may again become profitable with additional investment, but EVENTUALLY this will not be the case, and the property must be sold. This centralizes all land assets over time into the control of whichever conglomerate has enough resources to maximally develop the area.
And what of the tenants? Rent prices are deemed to have been at their maximum for the region. Tenants in this case are displaced, at least for the amount of time that redevelopment will take. And, because the value of a particular parcel of land seems likely to be similar to a neighboring one of identical size, this increase is likely to affect ALL housing providers in a particular area with similar circumstances, since we have to assume that development doesn't happen in massively disproportionate jumps.
It doesn't seem clear to me at all why landlords wouldn't be able to pass the value on to tenants.
The article referenced is about their Desktop application
Setting aside the content of the OP, what is the issue with Cloudflare?
Not OP, but it's listed as "cornflour" here: https://www.npr.org/2024/06/19/nx-s1-5012595/climate-activists-arrested-stonehenge
The article links back to a page/post from the group the activists were with, and appears to be the source of the substance identification.
Ava
joined 1 year ago
I'm sure that the protest size limits of 100 will be respected at a school with 55,000 students. This is definitely a realistic and effective strategy for them to take.