Bgugi

joined 2 years ago
[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Forwards from (liberal) Grandma.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just to clarify, he signs off in all caps so the post is officially the view of the strawman corporation.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Graphing negative values of r?

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dog brand dog.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The klinger method!

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's a metaphor.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I always like to say it takes a gun from "definitely causing hearing damage" to "probably not causing hearing damage... Right away"

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Entirely false

Yeah, only wackjobs think the Catholic church committed genocide in Canada.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Today's septic tank full of dead babies is brought to you by RAID: SHADOW LEGENDS!

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Inb4 hot takes that are especially relevant in June.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's an old story. The age range determination was like 2014, the big headline for genetic testing was done in like 2018.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Your DNA sequence is generally pretty stable, but other characteristics do. Epigenetics is the field. Another example is methylation, which is basically like your cell putting a post-it note that says "don't use this" on a particular region. By looking at a bunch of different methylation sites an age can be estimated.

But in this case, it appears that the article is just mixing up "genetic testing was performed" and "the ages were determined" (separate statements from previous articles.)

view more: ‹ prev next ›