Christobootswiththepher

joined 1 week ago
[–] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine there's no possessions.. I wonder if you can..

[–] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So everyone else should bail you out? That's what it is

Good on you. It takes courage.

[–] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How do you mean?

Fuck, this is good!

So this could be interpreted as ban big advertising from ads?

I think ultimately tightening of ad standards is likely the middle ground. I for one am sick of the blatant bulletin. As an industrial chemist even the freakin chemical companies do it. Like buddy, I'm a chemist, I need to know what it is to use it properly. I have now started running a campaign where if they don't cough up the deets, I (in consultancies) don't recommend the use of their products.

[–] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Emotional pollution Mind pollution SOUL POLLUTION

I concur.

Some places limit advertising more than others. Banned on footpaths and dangerous spots. What about sales persons? How do you brand a product? I think it would have to be well defined.

I am ok with technical information being provided by a staff member. So much shit is peddled through marketing. As the scientist designing the product, I want to tell them the truth, customers love the truth, in this regard. I think banning deception and conning further would be a good way. And fuck this debt model of economics. And how about universities turn back into noble education organisations, not cocksucking psuedo-businesses.

I think govts/politicians like keeping the vague open because they use it, too. Their propaganda departments are cucked with good fact checking teams.

Reporting for duty, sir!

view more: next ›