CrypticCoffee

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Minecraft is one of the biggest games on the planet. Very popular with the young. Not what many would consider beautiful.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That is quite a mixed bag response. Leaves me between they won't do nothing, and they might do something.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Anyway, that's enough about yourself...

Feels like you never truly where on Reddit if you felt it was a beacon of warmth and friendliness. Did you ever share an opinion contrary to the prevailing opinion on there?

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean it isn't. Progressivism only seems to exist as a word in America, because the USA has the red scares, and conflates communism and socialism, and so are scared of the phrase and had to reinvent their own.

In Europe, you have Conservatives (right wing market, socially conservative), Liberals (free market, but with positivity towards social reforms). Socialism or Democratic Socialism (positive social reforms, state involvement, but with democracy). Communism (economic distribution but more autocratic), and Social Democratic (somewhere between Liberal and Democratic Socialist). Socialism is where you're willing to consider the state getting involved in wealth redistribution.

It's better you understand political philosophy and how it is used and applies around the world to truly understand it. You cannot understand the spectrum, if you cannot zoom out from the Overton window.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't recommend staying with a company for 17 years. That's for sure. Best way to get stuck in a company specific niche skill that is not transferable. For the reasons stated you got to keep yourself positioned well skills wise and relevant so you can jump into any role you need at any time.

Integrity is not for the company. It's doing things the way you think they should be done and earn your own respect.

I would say all companies don't replace with cheaper. Many do. Especially the shitty ones. It's quite easy to avoid those like the plague. Many did, and learnt the hard way, many have staff that have seen failed outsourcing and are in a position to influence that.

Soloing knowledge doesn't keep you safe though as the penny pinching companies will remove anyway and clean up later regardless. It does not keep you safe. It's a false sense of security. Complacency is a death sentence in software development.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Professional integrity. Have you ever worked for a company that got screwed by a consultancy? Vendor lock in and charging scandalous amounts for little offer.

You are paid for your skills and your time. If you're confident in your ability and impact, you shouldn't have to be worried.

I'm not saying sacrifice for yourself for your company, and if they are a shitty company that would replace you with cheaper, get out, but also, giving nothing for the pay you get is a bit dishonest, and then you are no better than them.

Plus, you make the case that hiring people is bad and paying a consultancy is less risky.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Of course Jared didn't document anything and made themselves a bus factor. Real success is when Jared makes themself replaceable because hiding detail and making yourself critical is the best way to take a site down when you're on holiday and prevent other team members stepping in and taking ownership.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago

Top tier testing!

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Not perfectly optimised is fine, but non-functional isn't acceptable. I've never seen a quirk personally, and quirks aren't a good reason to help maintain Google's monopoly on web standards.

You may say less than 5% is fine, but it could be the margins in a low margin industry. 2% could be 40% of the profit.

I haven't seen a team operate where a senior isn't checking it.

Usually the bleeding edge stuff is used by small companies trying to establish themselves because they have nothing to lose and no reputation to protect.

Plus, when you got Browser Stack, you catch a lot of problems like this.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Because in web development there are compatibility tables of what features work with which browser. If a developer has used a feature poorly supported, they either haven't done their homework, or intentionally made that call.

In web development, most reputable Front End Devs would not choose bleeding edge, barely supported features even if the temptation was there because the user comes first. Generally, you wait until it has been adopted by the main browsers (chrome, safari, ff).

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Isn't this just the tech version of cuckooing?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuckooing

Illegally using someone's property to make profit from dodgy business.

view more: ‹ prev next ›