FundMECFSResearch

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF

What’s so sad about Hong Kong is I know we’re probably all going to watch this go down again in Taiwan.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

Don’t forget https://quiblr.com/

which I think is the only one that has a true algorithm.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

What, centralisation has the opposite effect. It makes things worse. Imagine lemmy.world shutting down (the biggest instance), lemmy would be fucked.

Decentralisation is to be encouraged. So if an instance shuts down, it’s not the end of the world.

Like how basically all lemm.ee communities were migrated.

That’s pretty smart of the admins, actually. Thankful they thought of that.

Yup, things like temperature, humidity, and atmospheric makeup can change quite a bit depending on geological periods.

There’s a bit of an evolutionary necessity to adapt on those timescales.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

But he’s got lived experience of totalitarianism. Of rhetorical practices states use to crush ideas.

Epistemically he’s very qualified to comment on this.

And academics who you might call historians, like Foucault, would back him up here.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (10 children)

But

  • Who decides who is the experts?
  • Who gets the opportunity to become an expert?
  • What are the experts taught at school?
  • Who picks the experts?

All this is political.

What you’re describing is technocracy. And it has major limitations.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Orwell would disagree, unfortunately.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 103 points 7 hours ago (15 children)

Politics and Science will literally always mix. Science always exists in a political context. It’s not some platonic ideal.

The research that gets funded, published, advertised. The people that have the privilege to get degrees and academia jobs. Is all inherently political. It’s maybe more obvious now with Trump’s meddling, but it literally always has been this way.

I think it’s dangerous to look at science (especially social sciences, political sciences, economics, sociology, psychology etc.) without considering the political context.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean. The Daily Mail Online is known to be one of the most rigorous publications!

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Me frantically going through all my Maths papers to replace the equal sign with “Is Equivalent to”

 

Alt Text:

In our recently submitted grants we had to change “traumatic brain injury” to “concussive brain injury” and “male and female mice” to “male and non-male mice” because traumatic and female are now verboten words that can get our grants killed. It’s insanity.

 

SBS Insight Invisible Illness – Statement by 4 Studio Participants

Published: 23 June 2025​

Invisible, Misrepresented, and Harmed: ME/CFS Voices Demand Accountability from SBS​

A Joint Statement from Participants and Advocates in Response to the 20 May 2025 Episode of Insight​

This statement has been prepared by a group of individuals who participated in the recent SBS Insight episode on invisible illness. We are united in our deep concern over how the episode was produced, edited, and presented and the serious harm it caused by misrepresenting Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS) and its impact on the wider chronic illness community.​

We believe this broadcast represents a clear breach of SBS’s own Code of Practice. The program:​

  • Failed to uphold editorial integrity by platforming a participant with undisclosed commercial interests (Section 3.1: Editorial Independence and Integrity);
  • Presented medically inaccurate and misleading portrayals of ME/CFS (Section 3.2: Accuracy);
  • Minimised the diversity of lived experiences in favour of a single recovery narrative (Section 3.3: Diversity of Views and Perspectives);
  • Caused emotional harm to participants and viewers alike (Section 4.1: Harm and Offence);

As a public broadcaster, SBS has a duty to ensure ethical, accurate, and inclusive storytelling, especially when dealing with marginalised communities.​

[…]

 

Alt Text:

This is a screenshot of a bluesky post from “The Tennessee Holler” posted 12 hours ago. The post reads: “If you’re zip-tying grandmas protesting losing health care maybe you’re not the good guys in the story?” The post includes a repost from Joe G posted 2 hours ago that says “Arresting people in wheelchairs protesting Medicaid cuts.” Below the text is a video thumbnail showing what appears to be law enforcement officers restraining an elderly person in a wheelchair in what looks like a government building or office setting.

The Post

 

The output of computer-vision research is overwhelmingly aimed towards monitoring humans. The potential ethical implications need more scrutiny.

 

Alt Text:

Woman in a wheelchair saying: “THERE IS NO MARRIAGE EQUALITY UNTIL PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES CAN MARRY WITHOUT LOSING BENEFITS”

127
What is 2? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 

Context:

In ZFC set theory (which most of modern maths is built upon). The natural numbers are defined as recursions of empty sets.

Ie. 0 = ∅ (the empty set)

1 = {∅} = {0}

2 = {∅, {∅}} etc…

 

Alt Text:

Sarcastic bluesky post saying [time traveling back to 1933 to make sure to tell Germans to protest Hitler less vigorously so as not to alienate bougie centrists who want to go to brunch undisturbed, thus preventing the rise of fascism]

 
view more: next ›