It's hard to beat an operation with state funding.
Tell me you got a without actually telling me you got a
, lib.
It's hard to beat an operation with state funding.
Tell me you got a without actually telling me you got a
, lib.
Oh yeah, well Nobel laureate Paul Krugman says "nuh-uh!". Checkmate leftists!
It's very easy to dispell this. ..... It's not hidden knowledge that liberalism has been the primary enemy of fascism........ I could respond with pages of reasoning and sources.
Or how about just one?
How DARE Putler™ reiterate the ceasefire conditions that haven't changed since the start of the conflict!
"He typically smoked crack every 20 minutes."
Anybody who is smoking crack is smoking it every 20 minutes.
Until they're out of crack
Still makes me cry laugh every time I read it.
I love the answers that are like 'just shitty market timing'. Because apparently, there is a right time to spend six figures on a car. $86K is still too much, this bozo has more hurt in store yet if he's obsessed with resale value.
Yeah, at 30 you should be ready to graduate to all of the capeless suburban dad fantasy schlock like Reacher, the Equalizer or CIA Jim in the Clancy bullshit.
What Hamas did was far, far worse than killing people in gas chambers
I'm as far from a Musk fan as you can get, but this whole narrative of him causing serious damage to the Ukrainian effort because of Starlink smells like western media establishing a fall guy to point to for when the effort ultimately fails. The US gov has subsidized ALL of his businesses so heavily, if Starlink were really that valuable to the operation, they would have forced his hand one way or the other. I was equally as skeptical when they touted Starlinks value in the very beginning of the dispute.
Part of me feels like this take is cynical just for the sake of being cynical, but then I remember that I watched the movie around the time that it came out, before it became 'the best movie of all time'. It got good reviews at the time, but it definitely didn't get that kind of praise out of the gate.
I remember that TBS would play it non-stop, and thinking about that now, it's probably a huge reason why this film got voted to that spot on IMDB. For me, I just watched a movie that I thought was pretty good ,worth re-watching, and years later when I heard 'it's been voted as......' , I thought 'yeah, I guess I could kind of see why it would get that vote'.
But if it's always been hyped to you as the greatest film of all time before you watched it.... I could also understand you asking what the big deal is.
As far as performances go, Freeman and Robbins aren't where the magic is. They're fine in their lead roles, but nobody ever says 'oooh Robbins was so good in that!'. It's the character actors that give this film it's shine.