[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago

Come on, don't be that guy...

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago

I can't but it's also not necessary. There are no conditions were no energy from renewables is produced. You have to cover peaks and shift electricity around a bit. The missing parts are interconnection and, dependend on price, overbuilding.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Comparing users to MAU seems disingenuous. The fediverse has ~12 million users, according to fedidb and around 1.1 million active ones.

Most of them on Mastodon.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago

TeChNOloGIeOFFenHeiT

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago

TECHNOLOGIEOFFENHEIT!1!!!!!!1

Wir wissen alle was ihr macht...

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Utility PV in Australia has a capacity factor of ~25%. So those six GW of PV will produce approximately the same amount of energy as the biggest nuclear reactor in Europe Olkiluoto 3 which took 18 years to build instead of 2.5.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 5 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately capacity is the first step, but its a step. I'll crack open a beer when it's consumption or production...

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

Yes for Sulfur derivates and nitrous oxigens but no for CO2. The biggest contributord to CO2 emissions are electricity production and traffic.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago

I think both. But either way, I am fine.

[-] Hugohase@startrek.website 5 points 8 months ago

AbEr eS kÖnNTe noCH wEniGer SeiN 🤓

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Hugohase

joined 9 months ago