JayDee

joined 5 months ago
[–] JayDee 20 points 2 hours ago

You can't fool me. If a sink was at my door, it'd knock.

[–] JayDee 36 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The remaster has Nani attend University, leaving Lilo in the care of their neighbor whose known their family forever, Tūtū. She also has an alien teleporter that allows her to visit Lilo frequently.

The film seems to choose to use some fairly hand-wavy solutions at the end so that they don't have to compromise the happy ending with bittersweetness.

Like, I don't think anyone would say Nani made the wrong choice by fighting hard and making sacrifices to hang onto her little sister in the original film, even though that holds its own sad implications.

I also think that the backlash over this new script is fairly justified, since it completely erases all the consequences that any real person in Nani's situation would face for making the same decision. There will be feelings of abandonment if you surrender your position as primary caregiver, even when it's the right choice. The movie goes out of its way a bit to have its cake and eat it too.

[–] JayDee 8 points 6 hours ago

Comfort him. Let him know that he's not a leper all of a sudden for having a moment of vulnerability. Listen. Make sure that they understand that they're heard.

These are pretty basic forms of emotional labor that go a long way in helping folks, and can even save lives at times.

[–] JayDee 10 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

You usually don't choose when you have a mental breakdown. The big thing here is that he crashed out and not a single one of his friends cared about his wellbeing enough to try and help. Just got told to go to a doctor.

[–] JayDee 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like they're 11 naked cowboys short.

[–] JayDee 9 points 7 hours ago

Are you under the impression that the US is the only country with meth? Literally every country mentioned has to deal with meth heads, I assure you. None of them gun those people down. It's a person having a medical emergency, not a rabid animal on the loose.

[–] JayDee 1 points 7 hours ago

Sure, that's what satire is. A parody of something to criticise it. Often using clichés to ensure the subject is immediately identifiable.

This comic is a satire of militant atheists, because the author finds that militant atheists are insufferable and deserve to be made fun of, as the comic is doing. Why else would the author choose them specifically to satirize?

You chose those two comments to point at examples of unintellectual discussion. I am pointing out that they are not as unintellectual as you paint them to be. I don't strongly agree with what they are saying, but that does not immediately disqualify them from contributing from the conversation. Your comment was the only one calling for the termination of the pursuit of deeper meaning in the comic, which is an anti-intellectual stance.

[–] JayDee 38 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

It's not war crimes because it isn't war. It's the slaughter and starvation of a civilian population. It's genocide.

[–] JayDee 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not exactly the only one. What do you think, $, %, &, @, and © classify as? They're all logographs.

[–] JayDee 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

That's somewhat my bad for taking the adversarial tone of your original comment to being serious and about all comments looking into the comic's unsaid meanings.

At the same time, though, the comic is 100% meant to make fun of militant atheists, as in atheists who make their whole personality atheism. The folks who's sole goal seemingly is to make everyone stop being religious. And the punchline is that despite achieving his goal, he only managed to make his mother's life worse by forcing her through an epiphany she wasn't ready for and then abandoning her with her own thoughts. The comic is partially funny because of it making fun of militant atheists. The other portion of the humor is the absurd nature of the situation.

The first comment you show takes that joke personally and the second resonates with that message. Neither of these are really off the mark, as grating as their tones may be to some.

[–] JayDee -3 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I mean, you get to make your own contribution because we're on an open platform, not for any other reason. quite often intellectual spaces shut down and deplatform anti-intellectual rhetoric and thought-terminating cliches such as what you've stated. It serves no one discussing the intricacies of any work to have someone yelling "The curtains were fucking blue!", and this comment section literally exists to discuss the above comic and its various aspects.

[–] JayDee 15 points 22 hours ago

"...I'm sorry, could you repeat that? The forest God wants to patch THEIR cell tower into our network? They have a cell tower?..... I guess patch them in..."

0
Nice Rock (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 week ago by JayDee to c/jschlatt@lemm.ee
 

It's actually a boulder, BTW.

-2
Mark trusted you (www.youtube.com)
 

Bottom text

 

Answer:

Tap for spoilerTHIS TOO SHALL PASS

6
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by JayDee to c/science@lemmy.world
 

This is a question regarding atomic and quantum physics, and any academic input would be appreciated. I am wanting some input on what level of trust I should put into this "Quicycle" group. It's a think tank comprised of supposed Doctors from CERN and research groups, and states their names. alot of their stuff raises red flags for me, though.

To preface, I was working on understanding how exactly, in 3d space, electron orbitals affect the magnetic field of their atoms. I'm wanting to better understand why atoms like Iron are more magnetic than others. I am not heavily plugged into the physics community, though - I'm mostly just learning out of personal curiosity.

I stumbled upon this group's periodic table of atomic orbitals, and it seems accurate on its face to a layman like myself. However, I start trying to research some of the terms and they're proposing things I've never heard of like pd-hybridization (where the p and d electron orbitals merge(?) to produce a hybrid orbital(?)).

I decided to look over their site with more rigor and I'm seeing things like Vivian Robinson: The Common Sense Universe (talking about 'common sense' when talking about quantum and "sub-quantum" mechanics seems really screwy) and M.A.R.T. (yet another theory of everything attempt) and I get a sinking feeling that nothing in this website is trustworthy for learning more in-depth physics.

Does any of this stuff look right to any Lemmy physicists?

view more: next ›